Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lib Author Regrets Voting for clinton / "Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America
The O'Reilly Factor | 9.4.03 | Mia T

Posted on 09/04/2003 11:02:26 AM PDT by Mia T

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

by Mia T. 9.4.03

CEW YORK, Sept.4- Gerald Posner revealed yesterday on "The O'Reilly Factor," (FoxNews), that he voted for clinton TWICE but would not have done so, knowing what he knows today.

He said that when he was researching his new book, he was nauseated -- literally -- by clinton's utter failure to protect America from the growing global threat of terrorism.

Posner added that he was further sickened by the attempt of the clintons and their minions to rewrite the clinton legacy of utter failure. (It was the terrorism, stupid.)
(see:
it won't s-p-i-n: CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme )


As an American Muslim and a political supporter of Clinton, I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then, that their counter-terrorism policies fueled the rise of Bin Laden from an ordinary man to a Hydra-like monster.

... Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

The clintons' failures unleashed global terror.
Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?





eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Connecticut; US: Florida; US: Illinois; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billclinton; clintonfailure; clintonfecklessness; clintonineptitude; clintonrape; clintonrevisionism; clintonstupidity; clintontreason; corruption; elections; fifthanniversary; geraldposner; gwot; hillary; hillaryclinton; pathto911; pathyo911; posner; posnerbook; terror; terrorism; theterrorismstupid; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: Deb
My Tag Skies to Gotham & Con-Fabs With Net Prexies

I take it then that there'll be no more BBQs with pharmers?

81 posted on 09/07/2003 7:17:17 PM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Well, what did Bush II do for 1 1/2 years before 9/11?

Let me guess. You were counting votes for the democrats' side in Florida during the fall of 2000, right? The math skills fit.

82 posted on 09/07/2003 7:57:28 PM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
I did go away but you keep appearing in my 'my comments' box.

I will also acknowledge that you're not much different than 99.9% of the Christians I've met - acting like a spiritual policeman patrolling people looking to interject your own perceptions based upon your own notion of what a person is allowed or not allowed to do or say in a given situation.
83 posted on 09/07/2003 8:28:49 PM PDT by Frapster (Jeremiah 9:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
"...you're not much different than 99.9% of the Christians I've met - acting like a spiritual policeman patrolling people looking to interject your own perceptions based upon your own notion of what a person is allowed or not allowed to do or say in a given situation."

Precisely.

You are the orginator of this practice on this thread. Your unsolicited critique prompted a review of your page. Crammed with the shining love of Jesus, I thought it strange that such a devoted disciple would offer criticisms so freely.

Personally, I tend to take criticisms in stride, but through long association with 'Christianity', I will say that it wears thin when the minions of Christ do exactly as you have done. Like most Christians, you were the first on the scene to "police" and you tend to receive input with far less grace than your supposed ideals would suggest.

Then again, maybe that is consistent with Christianity...
84 posted on 09/08/2003 5:34:22 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund PBS, NPR & PRAVDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
I genuinely see your perspective but still do not agree that your assessment is correct. I started to try once again to explain why I responded as I did to Mia's work but I realize that we're going to have to agree to disagree.

BTW - when I stand before the throne of Grace I'm not going to be able to point to anyone but myself when being held accountable for my life. Neither will you.
85 posted on 09/08/2003 9:01:40 AM PDT by Frapster (Philippians 2:12,13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; All
Click here for updates from the talented, intelligent, imaginative,
prolific conservative-extraordinaire...Mia T


Keep up the good work, T.

86 posted on 09/09/2003 8:33:01 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
All pharmers are Gods!!!

My dance card will always have a place for you!!!

87 posted on 09/09/2003 7:30:10 PM PDT by Deb (My Tag Skies to Gotham & Con-Fabs With Net Prexies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Deb
There could be no sweeter vision to consider as I retire, as I slumber, as I awaken to the morning sun.

Good night sweet Deb . . .

88 posted on 09/09/2003 8:02:31 PM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
BTTT
89 posted on 10/09/2003 10:12:38 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
You must be on dial-up.
90 posted on 10/21/2003 9:13:48 AM PDT by kylaka (Fry Mumia ! Now ! Then UPS his carcass to France.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
hillary talks:ON TERROR
(reinstalling the clintons in the White House has one advantage over suicide)


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

91 posted on 01/21/2004 8:29:51 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; All
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?


92 posted on 08/22/2005 6:13:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"Well, what did Bush II do for 1 1/2 years before 9/11?" Bush was not president until Jan of 2001. So that's a little over seven months before 9/11 not 1.5 yrs. Also they were already preparing for the war in Afganistan because he knew that the Taliban and Bin Laden had to be taken out.

He also was being tested by the big Dem contributors in Communist China as well, working on a realistic US energy policy (which might have helped some of today's problems) He also was dealing with a the sliding economy that the former administration lied about and covered up prior to the election.

And he did all this without getting BJ's from the help in the Oval Office. So why don't you take a hike..troll

93 posted on 08/22/2005 6:41:46 AM PDT by hford02 (the PETA gay pagan vegan community awaits their turn to be the silent majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


94 posted on 08/22/2005 6:21:35 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine; All



It is clear the clintons did not want to kill bin Laden.
What should be becoming increasingly clear is that the clintons did not even want to capture bin Laden.
READ MORE
here:
'The Path to 9/11':
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF

 
(Will be posting additional information about this soon....)

 

WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
(Part One)




THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON part one




UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."




CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)




'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
by Mia t, 2.13.06





ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE
(and doesn't even know it)
by Mia T, 4.28.06


ALBRIGHT
1: 'Bin Laden and his Network Declared War2 on the United States and Struck First and We Have Suffered Deeply'

 


WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



'The Path to 9/11' Annotated:
CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT



'The Path to 9/11': CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF


IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."


ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)



MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)


'The Path to 9/11':
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF


WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)


'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)


THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)


HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON



THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie


AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)


PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA


Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')



CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL


Reverse Gorelick


THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA



The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)



PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES


'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)


WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES

MORE





'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
THE ADDRESS
THE (oops!) TRUTH


"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 6

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... 1

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

 

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer




"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live



"You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards.  I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office.  In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week."

Bill Schneider
CNN
reporting on the Fulbright Prize
April 14, 2006

 

 

 
WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.

Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated
Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby

 

 

 

There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.

AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL

 


 

 
At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Mia T
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers


 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE







COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006


95 posted on 09/11/2006 6:44:30 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: medscribe

And the FIRST World Trade Center bombing, which almost worked!


96 posted on 09/11/2006 6:52:48 AM PDT by AmericanDave (Over it's NOT, till over it IS....... Yoda Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


97 posted on 09/11/2006 7:26:06 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Isn't Posner the fairy that was a Republican and then became an apologist for the Democrats?

It seems every time he writes a book he switches sides. Not surprising for a switch-hitter.
98 posted on 09/11/2006 7:29:40 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Well, what did Bush II do for 1 1/2 years before 9/11?

This boy's a regular historian,
99 posted on 09/11/2006 7:31:32 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave; medscribe; All
And the FIRST World Trade Center bombing, which almost worked!--AmericanDave


from:

'The Path to 9/11'
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF

(WHICH TIPPING HIM OFF QUICKLY REDUCED TO ZERO)
'WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
Part Two

by Mia t, 9.8.06

 





"You cannot explain to me why we have not captured or killed the tallest man in Afghanistan."

hear hillary clinton

 

"You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hear hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.3

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

hear bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

 



hen the damning tape surfaced, focus was naturally on bill clinton's (oops!) admission.

No one paid much attention to what may turn out to be even more incriminating: clinton's curious explanation of the missile strike at Kandahur that took out a phalanxlike formation of... empty tents... and allowed bin Laden (and the Mideast Muslim ego) to escape unscathed.

Ever notice how a crook volunteers way too much information when he's trying to explain away his crimes? This is especially true when the crook thinks you're an idiot and he's a genius.

"When I bombed his training camp and tried to kill him and his high command in 1998 after the African -Embassy bombings, some people criticized me for doing it. We just barely missed him by a couple of hours. I think whoever told us he was going to be there told somebody who told him that our missiles might be there. I think we were ratted out.7"

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

I agree. We were ratted out. bill clinton could not afford to capture or kill bin Laden. This information courtesy of none other than Madeleine Albright.

clinton's reaction--or should I say non-reaction-- to the USS Cole bombing in 2000--an unambiguous act of war--validates Albright's assertion.

clinton's refusal to take bin Laden in 1996--validates Albright's assertion.

That clinton summarily ignored and urged all of us to ignore the first attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor, the 1993 WTC bombing--ignore the first major Islamofascist terrorist attack on the continental United States!!--validates Albright's assertion.

The fact that "our national mourner," bill "I feel your pain" clinton, never even visited the site--he was only 15 minutes away mere days after the 1993 WTC bombing--validates Albright's assertion like nothing else.







7. The ABC miniseries, 'The Path to 9/11,' reported--(in the uncut version, anyway)--that Albright, herself, did the ratting, which makes sense: Madeleine Albright was obviously the clintons' Nobel Peace Prize point man and facilitator.

 

READ MORE

100 posted on 09/11/2006 8:07:05 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson