Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House told to alter intelligence bill (Bush Opposes Crack Down on Illegal Immigration)
The Washington Times ^ | October 4, 2004 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 10/04/2004 7:17:15 AM PDT by Goldwater4ever

The White House has told House Republicans that it wants them to remove provisions in their intelligence-overhaul bill that would crack down on illegal aliens' obtaining drivers' licenses, allow easier deportation and limit the use of foreign consular ID cards. The Senate's bill lacks those provisions, and as the two chambers race toward trying to pass a bill before the Nov. 2 election, the measures are a potential stumbling block. The White House wants those provisions out, according to a congressional source familiar with the bill. "They have expressed desire to kill some of the immigration provisions and gut some of others," the source said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Rosemary Jenks, a lobbyist for stricter immigration controls for the group NumbersUSA , who has been tracking the bill, said White House policy officials met with Republican staffers to urge them to remove the provisions, even though White House officials initially had signed off on those same provisions before the bill was introduced officially. "The White House was involved in the negotiations before the bill was introduced, and now, for some reason, it has come back and decided to insist that the main provisions, the most effective provisions of the bill, be gutted," she said. She said House Republican leaders appear to be standing firm in refusing the White House demands. A White House spokesman did not return a call for comment yesterday. ***

"This goes to the very heart of the entire conspiracy of 9/11," he said. "These people entered the country, got driver's licenses, used those driver's licenses to obtain the services they needed, and then used those driver's licenses to get on the plane."

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bush; illegalimmigrants; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
Good news for illegals, bad news for the United States.
1 posted on 10/04/2004 7:17:16 AM PDT by Goldwater4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Bush had better get his head out of his ass before next month.

Illegals are a major problem in Ohio. If he attempts to aid them then he will lose this state.

There are a lot of conservatives who will stay home.


2 posted on 10/04/2004 7:20:15 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Sometimes I wonder if Bush REALLY wants to win this election ...


3 posted on 10/04/2004 7:20:16 AM PDT by 11th_VA (Kill Babies NOT Terrorists - Kerry '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Kill the bill so illegals can KILL US ??

Whose side is bush on?


4 posted on 10/04/2004 7:20:40 AM PDT by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

The White House is walking a fine thin line on this one. It may be that Bush is counting the Mexican vote to help him pull this one out and he fears alienating them with these bills.


5 posted on 10/04/2004 7:20:56 AM PDT by JRPerry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Bush is trying really hard to lose the election.


6 posted on 10/04/2004 7:21:13 AM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever
I can't figure out Bush's stance against making people obey immigration law. I guess he is trying to court the Hispanic vote.
I guess I found the biggest thing I disagree with this administration...
I still will vote for him, but we have to try to change this stance, if we are serious about protecting ourselves against terrorists.
7 posted on 10/04/2004 7:21:20 AM PDT by DSBull (Truth is the light of the World, shine it everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Congress needs to distance themselves from this White house. Bush doesn't have the guts to veto it.

I say challenge him.


8 posted on 10/04/2004 7:22:08 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er ({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever
"She said House Republican leaders appear to be standing firm in refusing the White House demands.

Looks as though somebody on the House side has learned the meaning of resolve and backbone.

9 posted on 10/04/2004 7:23:03 AM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
What on earth is he thinking? Is he trying to make sure Kerry gets elected? This will tick off most conservatives I know, and provide wonderful ammunition for the Dark Side. (Or is that the dork side?)

It's true that few if any of us will change our votes because of this (who would we vote for, the poodle??), but the kind of active support he's going to need to get elected will be dampened by quite a lot. Suppressing this legislation is pure madness.

10 posted on 10/04/2004 7:25:34 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers. :: Kerry promises, but Bush delivers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

This is precisely the kind of thing that will cause me to have to hold my nose while voting for 43.

I did that with his daddy in '88 and '92, with Dole in '96, and with GWB in 2000.

Isn't there another Ronald Reagan out there, somewhere? Will we ever have a conservative candidate again, somebody outside the beltway-country club GOP establishment?

I'm way past tired of voting for "the lesser of two evils." I guess it's time to check out the Constitution Party website once more!


11 posted on 10/04/2004 7:25:54 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRPerry
Legal Mexican immigrants are just as opposed to illegal immigration as anyone else, maybe more so..

After all, they jumped through all the hoops, payed the money, waited patiently, to get here..
They don't appreciate illegals getting perks, etc. at all..

12 posted on 10/04/2004 7:26:36 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I'm sure this is a rove move. The guy is an illegal alien lover and a traitor.


13 posted on 10/04/2004 7:26:47 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRPerry

The Mexican vote? You mean the illegal alien vote? Are we DemocRATS now?


14 posted on 10/04/2004 7:26:48 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers. :: Kerry promises, but Bush delivers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

What is Bush's problem with stopping illegal immigration?

Bush is doing fine as a war president, but his thinking about closing the border is beyond me. This is bound to have an adverse effect on the man he picks to succeed him.

After Bush is elected it will be time to go after his immigration policies through the courts and the Legislature. If Bush won't stop illegals from entering this country the American people will have to go around him, and maybe the man who succeeds him too.


15 posted on 10/04/2004 7:26:56 AM PDT by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

I got this quote from the Federalist this morning.

"The bosom of America is open to receive not only the Opulent
and respectable Stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all
Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation
of all our rights and privileges, if by decency and propriety of
conduct they appear to merit the enjoyment." --George Washington

IF BY DECENCY AND PROPRIETY OF CONDUCT THEY APPEAR TO MERIT THE ENJOYMENT.

I wish Bush and his advisors who are misdirecting him would read the Federalist. And spend more time on FR.


16 posted on 10/04/2004 7:27:14 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Marriage is the bedrock of human civilization. Destroy marriage, destroy human civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

I will NOT vote for Bush if this is not changed. Mexico should NOT be anything special. They (Mexico) sure as hell don't bend over backwards to help the US or its citizens.


17 posted on 10/04/2004 7:27:24 AM PDT by chuckcam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

Rove is probably a political genius, but this is not about politics. This is about keeping the country safe. This is the kind of thing I would expect from the 'rats, but not from the guy I thought was on our side (as opposed to the side of the French, the EU, the UN, and most likely the terrorists).


18 posted on 10/04/2004 7:30:22 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers. :: Kerry promises, but Bush delivers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever
This sounds like political expediency.. or political trepidations..

Sounds like Bush is afraid the Dems will use the bill's passage as ammunition against him..
He's probably right..

But they will do so no matter what is in the bill..
If it is changed as he wishes, they will simply attack him for laxness on "security" issues..

damned if you do, damned if you don't..

19 posted on 10/04/2004 7:30:47 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

rove is the most dangerous individual today to the republic and the constitution.


20 posted on 10/04/2004 7:32:02 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson