Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Skulls Found In Mexico Suggest Early Americans Would Have Said 'G'Day Mate'
Independent (UK) ^ | 9-4-2003 | Steve Conner

Posted on 09/03/2003 4:42:49 PM PDT by blam

Skulls found in Mexico suggest the early Americans would have said 'G'day mate'

By Steve Connor, Science Editor
04 September 2003

The accepted theory of how prehistoric humans first migrated to America has been challenged by a study of an ancient set of bones unearthed in Mexico.

An analysis of 33 skulls found on the Mexican peninsula of Baja California suggests that the first Americans were not north Asians who crossed to the American continent about 12,000 years ago.

The skulls more closely resemble the present-day natives of Australia and the South Pacific, suggesting that there might have been an earlier movement to America across the Bering Strait separating modern Russia from Alaska.

The research, published in today's issue of the journal Nature, is the latest twist in the controversy over who were the first Americans and how did they arrive in the New World?

Native Americans today bear a close physical resemblance to north-east Asians and anthropologists have long believed that this is because they are both descended from the same ancestors, some of whom migrated to America across the Ice Age bridge that spanned the Bering Strait.

However, a team of scientists led by Rolando Gonzales-José of the University of Barcelona in Spain believes that a different scenario could have occurred prior to the accepted migration of northern Asians.

Dr Gonzales-José and his colleagues analysed the shape and dimensions of 33 skulls of a tribe of people who lived near the western Mexican coast of Baja California between 2,500 and 300 years ago.

These relatively long and narrow skulls share a closer affinity to the skulls of the present-day inhabitants of south Asia and the southern Pacific Rim.

This suggests that these particular people could not have shared the same ancestor as present-day native Americans whose skulls more closely resemble broad and short shape of northern Asians.

Tom Dillehay, an anthropologist from the University of Kentucky in Lexington, said the accepted idea of how America became populated with humans was probably far too simple. "More recent archaeological discoveries suggest that there were several different founding populations, arriving from different places," Dr Dillehay said.

"To complicate matters further, it is no longer certain that the first colonisers arrived about 12,000 years ago - some archaeological sites in South America date from 12,500 years ago, which suggests that the first humans arrived at least 15,000 years ago," he said.

Dr Dillehay said the ancient people who lived on the long peninsula of Baja California probably became isolated from the rest of the north American population. This meant they retained the much older ancestral trait of a long and narrow skull.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acrossatlanticice; americans; australia; bajacalifornia; brazil; brucebradley; clovis; dennisstanford; dillehay; early; gday; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; mate; melanesia; mexico; preclovis; precolumbian; skulls; solutrean; solutreans; tomdillehay; walterneves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Right Wing Professor
Good report, thanks. I notice they have the terminology correct, paleo-Americans and paleo-Indians.
41 posted on 09/18/2003 3:13:39 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: blam
I am acquainted with Dr. Dillehay. Before I got my current job, I worked as a research analyst (fancy name for a principal lab tech) at the University of Kentucky dept. of Forestry. One of my duties was identifying samples of obscure wood. Dr. Dillehay sent over a very strange object that he found at the excavation site at Monte Verde. It had the structural features of a fine-grained softwood, but appeared to me made of lead sulfate, or some other dense, dark metal or metal ore. I never could identify it satisfactorily.
42 posted on 10/19/2003 5:55:44 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
"It had the structural features of a fine-grained softwood, but appeared to me made of lead sulfate, or some other dense, dark metal or metal ore. I never could identify it satisfactorily."

Was this a natural or man-made object?

43 posted on 10/19/2003 9:36:41 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blam
It appeared to be natural, but I couldn't tell if it was "organic" vs "mineral". It may have been an example of wood whose atoms are replaced by metal...this happens often in nature, and I have a lot of ironstone fossils...but I don't know how it could have happened in the short time this object would have been in residence, about 14,000 years. This process normally takes many eons.
44 posted on 10/19/2003 11:19:55 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
"This process normally takes many eons."

Maybe a human modified object that had already gone through the the mineralization process.(?)

45 posted on 10/19/2003 12:04:14 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Just updating the GGG information, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

46 posted on 09/14/2005 11:22:52 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

I'm going to catch crap for this, but what if this is evidence of time travel and were just overlooking it?

*tin foil hat off*


47 posted on 09/14/2005 11:47:54 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
Looks like your post did a little time travelling. The thread's two years old. :-)

(Time travel would confuse histnory no end, undoubtedly)

48 posted on 09/15/2005 5:59:02 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor (... just call me Pangloss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.

from two keywords, "solutrean" and "solutreans", sorted chrono: To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


49 posted on 06/24/2009 3:00:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.troopathon.org/index.php -- June 25th -- the Troopathon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson