Free Republic

How? ... esp. when the objective study showed that something like 80% of the abuse was by active homosexuals against adolescents/young teens. It would be hypocritical to still be hiding these facts re: placing children under the possible future influence of the homosexual lifestyle unnecessarily. No child should be forced into a setting of confusion ... and that would also include the child of the lesbians that is being used here.

What about Church concern for all the other children? “lead us not into temptation” So what happens when the children are invited to socialize and thus get used to the idea of this different kind of “family”? And what will they learn about something that their own parents do not wish to expose them to ... expecially “up close and personal”? Could parents, in the future, be accused of bias and prejudice if they refuse to have their children socialize with this child outside the school setting??

These “parents” are using the child to further their own agenda. Since they obviously do not abide by the Church’s teachings they are obviously not sending the child to this school for its religious training ... so any other private school with a similar record for education would be more honest to enroll their child in.

They should sue the pants off the school and each and every particular individual who ordered them to remove clothing or get suspended. These people are paid by American taxpayers who expect their American children to be given their freedoms under our Constitution at ALL times. Teachers/principals should face individual charges and not be allowed to fall back on their unions for unwarranted security. Our various American organizations should also bring lawsuits so this won’t continue. The individual teachers should pay the price so that in the future individual teachers won’t take it upon themselves so easily to deny rights to students without fears of opposition according to the law.

And, Woodward, if he were a Republican?? I thought so!!

Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army. So now that the public knows, the public can demand that a man with such a reputation also defend the Constitution from its "other" enemies today. The public and the "right" media should get involved in this upcomg trial and demand Obama come forth with all of his background that questions his type of citizenship. Make it hard for such a trial to assist Obama in his ongoing secreting of documents. Make noise.

Well, now that the horse is already out of the barn and the terrorists have theirs, the honest citizens are asked to become defenseless. Nice protection of the enemy.

And now the proliferation begins - esp. by those nations fearing Iran and who previously believed they could count on the U.S. for their protection.

The line is of popes of this era - before the era of peace or the time of living in the Divine Will (as we pray in the Our Father) - when the scriptural prediction of Satan being chained for a period (symbolic 1000 years) after the defeat of the Anti-Christ and after the purification before the Era of Peace. When this period is over Satan will then again be released to roam the earth before the final judgment and end of world. This is not the last pope then but it could be the pope of prophecy who will be forced to flee Rome and go into hiding. The Church will be persecuted as we see it beginning and go underground during an eclipse of the sun for the Church during the New World Order’s attempt to eliminate all true faith.

The irony is that this pope is the one who didn’t mess around and called for the clean up of the “filth”, getting rid of Maciel and others. With all the earthquake activity as well as floods, etc., UK ought to think twice about this possible attempt to assist Satan.

Benedict may be the pope of prophecy who will be forced to leave Rome and go into hiding. The salivating apostates of the past decades will then use the chaos (does that sound familiar?) to place their false pope (allowing all that is forbidden now by natural law/morality) into Peter’s seat - the “false prophet” and his “false church” who will assist the man/tyrant of the New World Order (anti-Christ?). How long now before the mass persecution begins?

“Chief Exorcist” is a general label because of his age and experience and the fact that Fr. Amorth established the international group of Exorcists which he is only the entitled leader due to his retirement.

I believe he refers to all the cases he’s asked to assess - whether they are psychological in nature, etc. And he can “farm” them out to other exorcists. Also the cases begun by others with less relief are often brought to him as last resort. He also sees same individuals often over a length of time. Exorcisms can last for years sometimes - depending on many things.

Someone mentioned as seemingly odd that the Vatican has exorcists. Well, Christ began the Church’s exorcisms Himself and the Church continues what He taught and gave power to.

Some of the Vatican’s “hiding” could be more of just not advertising events in care for family members involved or cases still being investigated.

Otherwise, in today’s anti-Church bias, advertising every event would only add more fuel to the atheistic ranting fire. The present Pope is really getting the secular/atheistic forces’ guns in his face lately. Pray for him.

The prophetic novel, “Plague Journal” by Canadian author Michael O’Brien warned of this stuff in the near future.

It ain’t the ducks who’ve “quacked up”!!

and connection to the occult:

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/nambla-gate-the-strange-case-of-kevin-jennings-part-three/

One of O’s heroes - next to Castro ... and didn’t Cuba run out of toilet paper recently??

Those Early Church Fathers continue to convert!!

I guess black conservatives have been frightened away:

http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/08/07/seiu-thugs-beat-black-conservative-activist/

Ummm, yeah! No larger plot there:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2785733.ece

At the time of, and leading up to the the Crucifixion, Jesus' brothers did not believe in Jesus as the Son of God...Jesus wanted a Christian to look after His mom...So Jesus appointed His most trusted friend, John to look after her... Besides, John was the only Apostle there...Peter and the rest of the bunch chickened out and didn't want to be caught any where near the Crucifixion... How convenient! The only ones in Jesus' "family" who weren't heroic and saintly and "trustworthy" were all the "brethren"! Didn't know anyone today was sooo cozy with the "brethren" of that day and their proclivities - even AFTER their years of such an assumed intimate family influence! Not one of them!! Like a Jewish mother would be apt to say ..."So, you were there??" And Peter wasn't "Christian"? I'm certain "arrangements" could have been made prior to this moment since the Christ could certainly foresee the ultimate faithfulness of the other disciples - esp. the one He called "Rock". No, not trustworthy at all - just the one He built His Church upon! After all, Peter had the experience of his own mother-in-law's care! Since "brethren" then were like "brethren" today, we all have a very large family indeed!!

If you can determine from the universe as it exists today that it could not have been created in six days 5769+ years ago because of the uniformitarian assumption, then you must also reject the virgin birth because such things simply don't happen. If you are going to exempt the virgin birth from the uniformitarian assumption, then you must logically exempt the creation of the universe from it as well. Are you saying that the creation of the universe (however long it took - being after all, scripturally, it is stated that a "day is like a thousand years" and vice versa), by a God with no beginning and no end, is something that can ever be completely or literally understood even by "formitarian" facts that of themselves (as well as the human mind itself doing the interpreting) are of a completely different and limited categorical dimension than the subject being studied itself?? Absurdity!

And this type of “progressive” mentality - if it were back in the day - would be supporting some feminist mob calling for the “compassionate” abortion of God Himself due to Mary’s “unfortunate situation”.

I wonder too just why Jesus had to give His mother to His beloved apostle, John, for care until her death, from the cross itself, at the moment of His own death, IF He had so many “brethren” (or literal, brothers, as interpreted by the other “progressives” here rather than the researched common usage of the term at the time) who would have
naturally had that responsibility, esp. within the Orthodox Jewish Faith. Of course, just as this “preacher” does, apparently others here must, in this matter as well, rely only upon the limitations of the “literal” current interpretations by the skeptics.

Pick and choose your personal area for limiting God’s Holy Will!! It’s in fashion!!

Many in society mistakenly think that to challenge literalism is to challenge the norms of Christianity. Talk about being "literal". This guy and his ilk can't get beyond the latest cultural PC interpretations of anything. Thus they are unable to accept the supernatural. They are blinded by what they can measure or view through their own limitations and what the current ideologies tell them to accept as true. They refuse to admit the possibility that they may even suffer from their own human limitations - and trust what has proven true by its fruits for generations. It's called ... guess what ... Pride!! "Unless you become as little children..."