Posted on 10/06/2023 7:57:56 AM PDT by Red Badger
Dreams of a world powered by antigravity got quashed by a particle physics today.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It turns out that Einstein was right yet again. A recent experiment just proved that antigravity doesn’t exist and we probably won’t ever get to use antimatter to levitate or build a perpetual motion machine or power warp drives (sorry, Star Trek).
Antimatter itself is very real. Made of particles that mostly behave like regular matter, but their electrical charges are reversed, an anti-proton looks just like a proton but has a negative charge, while an anti-electron (or positron) looks and moves just like an electron but has a positive charge. When a bit of antimatter bumps into a bit of matter, they explode so dramatically that all of their combined mass is converted into energy.
Now we know that matter and antimatter are drawn toward each other — not pushed apart — by gravity. Physicist Albert Einstein predicted this in his theory of general relativity years before the first positron was discovered, but Aarhus University physicist Emma Anderson and her colleagues at ALPHA (the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus) just tested the theory by watching atoms of anti-hydrogen — a single anti-electron orbiting an anti-proton — fall downward under the pull of Earth’s gravity.
The researchers recently published their work in the journal Nature.
AU REVOIR, ANTIGRAVITY
In a nutshell, Anderson and her colleagues dropped atoms of antihydrogen down a tube, and the atoms fell downward thanks to gravity. That sounds simple, and in fact, it’s exactly what Einstein predicted would happen — but it hadn’t been done before. Until now, there was a lingering chance that antimatter wouldn’t feel the tug of Earth’s gravity, or that matter and antimatter actually experienced a sort of antigravity, pushing each other apart.
To make anti-hydrogen, you need to combine positrons and anti-protons. Anti-protons are produced in high-energy particle collisions, then slowed down in what's called an antiproton decelerator at CERN (which is also home to the Large Hadron Collider). Positrons come from radioactive decay of certain chemical elements, like potassium.
Once you have the antimatter, you face the challenge of working with something that will disappear if it touches even another atom of ordinary matter. The team used an eight-pole magnet to keep antihydrogen atoms swirling along the magnetic field lines and away from the deadly walls of the container. Anti-atoms with enough energy (anti-atoms that were moving fast enough, in other words) could still escape, but slower ones would be trapped inside the magnetic field.
This illustration shows what anti-hydrogen atoms falling through the magnetic trap might look like if we could actually see them. - NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
When the researchers turned their tube of captured antimatter vertically, they found that the atoms moving downward along the magnetic field lines sped up thanks to the added pull of gravity; the atoms moving upward slowed down, also thanks to gravity trying to pull them Earthward. Anderson and her colleagues couldn’t actually watch the anti-atoms in action, of course, but their instruments counted the tiny flashes of energy every time an anti-hydrogen atom, pulled downward by gravity, gained enough speed to punch through the magnetic field at the bottom of the container and escape, annihilating itself and an unfortunate atom of regular matter in the process.
“To do the experiment, you're actually just turning down the current that makes the magnetic field,” Hangst tells Inverse. “You have a cloud of [anti-hydrogen atoms] bouncing around, and you let them go.”
When that happened, about 80 percent of the anti-hydrogen atoms fell toward Earth. The rest, about 20 percent, were still bouncing upward fast enough to keep going. That’s pretty much the result you’d expect from a tiny cluster of regular hydrogen atoms bouncing around in a magnetic field, too.
That suggests that matter and antimatter both feel the pull of Earth’s gravity in the same way, which means matter and antimatter are attracted, not repelled, by each other’s gravity. In other words, the experiment confirmed that matter and antimatter are drawn together, just like all the other mass in the universe, regardless of their weird properties.
“If you walk down the halls of the department and ask the physicists, they would all say that this result is not the least bit surprising, but most of them will also say that the experiment had to be done because you can never be sure,” says University of California at Berkeley physicist Jonathan Wurtele, a coauthor of the study, in a recent statement. “You don’t want to be the kind of stupid that you don’t do an experiment that explores possibly new physics because you thought you knew the answer, and then it ends up being something different.”
WHERE’S ALL THE ANTIMATTER?
While we can’t use antimatter to levitate or power a perpetual motion machine, we also can’t blame antigravity for shoving all the antimatter out of the universe we see around us, which would have been a convenient way to explain the one prediction of Einstein’s that antimatter definitely doesn’t seem to obey.
According to general relativity, antimatter and matter should exist in equal amounts. But there’s almost no antimatter in the universe, or at least anywhere in the universe we can see and measure. And that raises important questions, like where the heck did it all go?
One idea was that shortly after the Big Bang, matter and antimatter basically gave each other a giant shove apart, separating each other once and for all except for a few tiny, scattered particles. But Anderson and her colleagues’ experiment proves that’s just not how antimatter works, leaving physicists with another big mystery to solve.
WHAT’S NEXT
By varying the strength of the magnetic field — and thus varying how fast anti-atoms had to move in order to punch through it and escape — Anderson and her colleagues managed to measure how much the pull of gravity accelerated the antimatter. The answer turned out to be around 32 feet per second (per second), which is roughly how much Earth’s gravity accelerates ordinary falling matter, too.
One of the next steps is to measure that even more precisely to make sure there’s not really any small difference in how much antimatter accelerates as it falls downward. In other words, that it feels gravity’s pull just as strongly as regular matter, not more or less.
But for now, Anderson and her colleagues are focused on studying how antimatter interacts with radiation. If Einstein’s predictions are correct, anti-hydrogen should absorb, emit, and reflect the same spectrum of light as regular hydrogen — so Anderson and her colleagues will spend the next year or so zapping antimatter with lasers and microwaves to find out.
No ‘anti-gravity’?............... 😒
Thanks for the article. This was a great line:
“You don’t want to be the kind of stupid that you don’t do an experiment that explores possibly new physics because you thought you knew the answer ...
That’s the kind of thinking that won Richard Feynman the Nobel Prize. He had his graduate student’s look into the source data for some textbook curves, and they (and he) could not find the experimental evidence for the low end (right side) of the curves. When they did the experiments, they found that the textbooks (and underlying theory) were wrong.
Re:4) Walter Munk of Scripps demonstrated an experimental method to measure ocean temperature. It would have provided definitive data about global warming. ‘Save the Whales’ shut it down so now we’re stuck with hockey sticks.
Oh BALDERDASH!! More crap based on existing theories. Do ppl ever learn!? There is so much yet to be discovered and learned, around the corner.
The anti-hydrogen atoms and the hydrogen atoms, were not free to decide on their own, because, they were trapped in a magnetic field which left them with no choice(s). They need to try the experiment again with no magnetism involved, since magnetism involves using regular matter. Try the experiment again with ‘anti-magnetism’ and then we can talk about whether anti-gravity exists or not.
(just nit-picking)
I’ve heard that anti-Fa doesn’t exist, that it’s a myth. Let’s have these scientists do experiments on that, and perhaps then we’ll have a definitive answer. ;)
No wonder it fell. Anti Gravity particles have half the mass as Gravity particles. Sheesh...Duhhh!!!!
UFO manufacturers and pilots would disagree.
One day I’ll take time to learn more detail about experiments such as these and with particle accelerators. One thing I’m interested in is exactly how they do measurements to not only detect the existence of things like positrons, but also can track their movement.
So, a Bizzaro World.
In the pursuit of antigravity, they unwittingly discovered antitime
And Jesus!..................
Unless it really didn’t “fell” but the universe moved to it — that would be antigravity and no one can prove it didn’t happen — lol
Antigravity always used to claim that Uncle gravity wouldn’t stop and ask directions.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
