Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research
various FR links and stories and posters | 12-07-03 | The Heavy Equipment Guy

Posted on 12/7/2003, 11:44:56 PM by backhoe

The purpose of this post is to begin providing links, tools, and tactics which we can all use to educate the public, fellow citizens, and neighbors about Hillary Clinton.

It is a work in progress- I have provided a starting point, but want others to chime in with more links, stories, and information.

It is the product of conversations with a number of other members, from which several salient tactical points emerged:

1- keep it as contemporary as possible- the old Whitewater and similar items are stale and dead to the public.
2- keep it civil, please- within the board guidelines, or better. We are trying to convert the mushy middle, and stridency puts them off. Badly.
3- source or reference everything. Authenticity is critical to such an effort.

Here's where it started:


Links from this post:
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 7 Dec 2003
Various big media television networks ^ | 7 Dec 2003 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces
Follows:
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3923fdd07554.htm
Hillary's delegates spit on and taunt Police Honor Guard at her Convention
Politics/Elections News Keywords: HILLARY'S RADICAL SUPPORTERS
Source: Albany Times Union Posted on 05/18/2000 07:27:28 PDT by 1Old Pro

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1032083/posts
Bagram G.I.: Troops Waited While Hillary Chowed Down
NewsMax.com ^ | 12/02/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1022571/posts
..HILLARY & TERRORISM's plan to regain the White House..
J.R. NYQUIST Website ^ | 11/09/2003 | RICHARD ROBERTS

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1003138/posts
PETER PAUL SUES BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON FOR FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, UNJUST ENRICHMENT
Judicial Watch ^ | Oct 16, 2003 | Press Office

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1008003/posts
Hillary Stonewalls AP's Questions on Peter Paul Lawsuit
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/25/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/962304/posts
Hillary Clinton's Biggest Cover-ups

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926091/posts
Hilary – great cartoons

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/940060/posts
Hillary history
487 posted on 12/07/2003 12:06:47 PM EST by mathluv
 
HAL9000 has a great source; he works continually to keep it updated--
http://www.freerepublic.com/~hal9000/
 
 
THE DOWNSIDE LEGACY ARCHIVES
http://www.alamo-girl.com/
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1003911/posts
Hillary Clinton 10-16-03 Senate Speech
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html ^ | 10-16-03 | HILLARY CLINTON

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/834207/posts
HLLLARY RODHAM, U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee = Future Disasters
Posted on 02/01/2003 8:13 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE
 
Paul takes the fall?
Insight on the News, Oct 1, 2002, by Paul M. Rodriguez
http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:TWF-4MeGNM0J:www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m1571/37_18/92589574/p1/article.jhtml+Tonken,+clinton&hl=en&ie=UTF-8



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2016election; alexisherman; backhoe; baopeide; bernardschwartz; billburton; billkennedy; binliu; brucelindsey; changlintien; charlietrie; chenqingchang; chushulong; clinton; clintonterm3; collui; conspiringclintons; craiglivingstone; davidchang; davidwang; dossier; dwightholton; election2016; elections; ericholder; fbifiles; generalchihaotian; generalfuquanyou; generalwuquanxu; genjishengde; haroldickes; hazeloleary; hill; hillary; hillaryarchive; hillaryclinton; hillaryscandals; hoytzia; illusionist; irasockowitz; irenewu; jamesriady; jamesrubin; jamiegorelick; janehuang; jeffeller; jenniferoconnor; jezebel; jiangsuyongli; jingweili; johndeutch; johnhuang; johnnychung; johnpodesta; josecabrera; josephlandon; kenhsui; keshizhan; lando; lannydavis; liaominglong; lippobank; lippogroup; lippopacific; loral; lynncutler; mackmclarty; manlinfoung; mariahsia; markgearan; markjimenez; markmiddleton; marvinrosen; mochtarriady; nancyhernreich; nannanxu; nealainley; neilegglseston; nglapseng; noralum; obama; obamaresearch; opporesearch; panyongming; patsythomasson; peterpaul; projecthillary; rickiseidman; robertmeyerhoff; rogertamraz; ronbrown; saveamerica; shaoxingsheng; shenrongjun; shijinyu; shizengchen; sidneyblumenthal; sisterping; stephanopoulos; stophillary; suenyankwong; susietompkinsbuell; tedsioeng; terrymcaullife; tianyi; tinear; tongsunpark; wahlim; wangjun; wangliheng; wangmeitrie; williammeddoff; williampeh; xiaoyang; xipingwang; zoujiahua
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,761-1,780 next last
To: All
Disgraced Sandy Berger joins Hillary Clinton campaign
 
Media Matters: We’re Not Political
 
Hillary Supporters Steered $6 Million to Media Matters!--The other story I hope Rush hits on today is the family the democrats used to promote the State Children's Health Insurance Program. The family reported salary around 80K, owned several businesses & rental property and paid $20,000 per year for private schools for their two kids. Yet, they want me and you to pay their kids health insurance.
 
PUBLIC PAYS FOR UPPER CLASS' PRIVATE ED. (NYC elite disability scammers?)
 
Getting the last laugh --For more than you ever wished to know about The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock, click the picture:

Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research:

AN ESSENTIAL STEP IN SAVING AMERICA


741 posted on 10/8/2007, 2:38:55 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Believe Hillary’s Promises? You Can’t Fix Stupid
 
 
SCHIP = Socialist HillaryCare
 
Will Sandy Burgler Advise Hillary How To Lie, Cheat & Steal, Or Is He Being Kept On A Short Leash?
 
Longest Continuous Texas Hold-em Game: Clintons And The Media
 
 
The left cares about nothing but its own perpetuation--They will pimp children to demagogue issues, as in this photo. They will pimp other children and LIE about who they are, as they did when they said that the child who gave the radio address on the S-CHIP issue was from a poor family. Just using the child at all is a disgusting display of shameless pandering, but as this intrepid Freeper has pointed out, the child isn't even exactly who they said he was. The MSM never even questioned the claims, of course. Why would they bother---their aims are indistinguishable from the Dems' aims. Mark Steyn has more. Glad he can keep his sense of humor; personally, I am just disgusted. (HT: Powerline)

742 posted on 10/8/2007, 6:32:24 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Why Democrats Must Lie To Win (Rush Mentions Free Republic Alert)
 

Here’s one that pretty interesting too.

Hillary’s poisoned poster child

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin020400.asp

FLORIDA IS HOME to an ill-fated child whose life was ruined upon becoming a political pawn.

In 1994, Hillary Clinton used Kathy Bush when citing her case as an example of the high cost of medical care.


743 posted on 10/8/2007, 11:34:49 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hillary, Soros, Alinsky, and Rush

 

Foundation Watch: Soros’s Democracy Alliance

October 9th, 2007

From a December 2006 article in the Capital Research Center publication Foundation Watch (pdf file):

George Soros’s Democracy Alliance: In Search Of A Permanent Democratic Majority

By James Dellinger and Matthew Vadum

Despondent after George W. Bush won re-election, a small group of billionaire Democrats met in San Francisco in December 2004 to reflect on John Kerry’s failure to capture the White House. George Soros, Progressive Insurance chairman Peter B. Lewis, and S&L tycoons Herb and Marion Sandler were angry and depressed. They felt they had been taken—seduced by the siren song of pollsters and the mainstream media who had assured them that the capture of the executive mansion was theirs. But despite giving millions of dollars to liberal candidates and 527 political committees, the donors came away with nothing. At about the same time another group of wealthy Democratic donors was meeting at a hotel in Washington, D.C. feeling the same way. “The U.S. didn’t enter World War II until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor,” political consultant Erica Payne told the meeting. “We just had our Pearl Harbor.”

Determined to bring the Democratic Party back from the political wilderness, Soros and the others decided they needed a long-term strategy to regain power. Former Clinton official Rob Stein urged them to copy conservatives who had spent four decades investing in ideas and institutions with staying power. Over the next year Stein would become well-known for a PowerPoint presentation called “The Conservative Message Machine’s Money Matrix.” He used graphs and charts to show how the conservative movement was comprised of an intricate network of organizations, funders and activists. Stein’s presentation was apparently convincing. In 2005 the Democracy Alliance was born. It was an odd name for a loose collection of superrich donors committed to building organizations that would propel America to the left.

In April 2005, Soros gathered together an even larger group. Seventy millionaires and billionaires met in Phoenix, Arizona, to firm up the details for their fledging political financing clearinghouse. The attendees heard presentations on why all the pro-Democratic Party 527 groups on which they lavished millions of dollars failed to deliver the election to Kerry. But now they had a new strategy to make a difference.

Finances

To join the Democracy Alliance, there is one requirement: You must be rich. Members, who are called “partners,” pay an initial $25,000 fee and $30,000 in yearly dues. They also must pledge to give at least $200,000 annually to groups that Democracy Alliance endorses. Partners meet two times a year in committees to decide on grants, which focus on four areas: media, ideas, leadership, and civic engagement. Recommendations are then made to the DA board, which passes them on to all DA partners. The Alliance discourages partners from discussing DA affairs with the media and it requires its grant recipients to sign nondisclosure agreements.

As a result, it is hard to learn much about the Alliance’s grant making. There were no grants voted on at the DA’s April 2005 organizing meeting in Phoenix. However, when the group met in October of that year at the Chateau Elan Winery & Resort in Atlanta, Georgia, it decided behind closed doors to dole out $28 million to nine grantees. Most of that money went to well-known groups, including the Center for American Progress and Media Matters for America.

Representatives of smaller, less prominent groups were reportedly miffed at the process. “No one knew why the nine groups had been picked. Funding progressive infrastructure was all well and good, but no one bothered defining precisely what ‘progressive’ meant,” wrote Ari Berman, a writer for the leftist Nation magazine. “There was an almost complete lack of actual substance,” Berman quoted one attendee saying.

After the negative feedback from the Phoenix meeting, DA leaders changed the process and allowed groups to apply for grants. The next meeting, held in Austin, Texas, in May

2006, was better received in left-wing circles. Progressive leaders such as Andy Stern, who is president of Service Employees International Union, spoke during panel discussions, and grant-seekers were allowed to network with DA partners. “I’ve made it a mission to hate the Democracy Alliance,” Berman quoted one attendee who heads a grant-seeking group, “and I was pleasantly surprised.”

With an eye on the approaching November elections, the Alliance decided to give another $22 million to 16 groups focused on electoral politics. These groups included the Center for Community Change, US Action, ACORN, EMILY’s List, and the Sierra Club. Former president Bill Clinton dropped by the Austin meeting for a friendly greeting, but when one DA partner asked why Democrats don’t apologize for supporting the Iraq war, Clinton went on a 10-minute tirade, yelling that if he had been in Congress, he would have voted to authorize the war. “It was an extraordinary display of anger and imperiousness,” said partner Guy Saperstein, an Oakland, California attorney. “Clinton’s response was a not-so-subtle warning to partners to avoid divisive issues, like the war, that might harm his wife in the next president election,” wrote Berman.

The DA’s third round of funding was expected to be decided at a Miami, Florida, meeting scheduled for November 2006. Details of the meeting were not available at Foundation Watch’s press time.

DA’s managing director, Judy Wade, said she hopes the Alliance will work with other funding groups and eventually give out $500 million in grants each year.

Selected Grant Recipients

We can identify a number of left-wing groups that have gone through the DA’s vetting process and received funding. Some grant amounts have been reported in the press but there is no official tally.

*Media Matters for America: Former conservative journalist David Brock’s group claims to expose right-wing news bias. The Internet-based media watchdog, launched in May 2004, describes itself as “a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.”

*Center for American Progress: Former Clinton White House chief of staff John Podesta heads the think tank that received $5 million from the DA. The organization aspires to be the Heritage Foundation of the left. Spinoffs include Campus Progress and the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a 50 1(c)(4) lobby group. The Action Fund’s “Kick the Oil Habit” campaign is led by actor-environmentalist Robert Redford.

*Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW):

This Soros-funded group sees itself as a left-wing version of Judicial Watch, the conservative legal group that filed a barrage of lawsuits against the Clinton administration in the 1990s.CREW executive director Melanie Sloan is a former U.S. Attorney and Democratic counsel for the House Judiciary Committee….

*Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN): ACORN is a radical activist group active in housing programs and “living wage” campaigns in inner cities neighborhoods in more than 75 U.S. cities. In recent years it has been implicated in a number of fraudulent voter-registration schemes.

*EMILY’s List: While the political action committee boasts that it is “the nation’s largest grassroots political network,” it is essentially a fundraising vehicle for pro-abortion rights female political candidates. Donations to the organization are not tax-deductible. EMILY, according to the group’s website, “is an acronym for ‘Early Money Is Like Yeast’ (it helps the dough rise).” The group’s president is veteran political fundraiser Ellen Malcolm.

*America Votes: Another get-out-the-vote 527 organization, it is headed by Maggie Fox, a former deputy executive director of the Sierra Club. The group received a $6 million funding commitment from George Soros despite the billionaire’s protestations that he has turned his back on political campaigns.

*Air America: The struggling left-wing talk radio network filed for bankruptcy protection on October 13 after it reportedly had received a funding commitment of at least $8 million from the Alliance. The network touted by comedian Al Franken is said to have lost an astounding $41 million since 2004. Longtime radio executive Scott Elberg is Air America’s chief executive officer. The network’s headliners include TV sleaze merchant Jerry Springer.

*Center for Community Change: This longtime group dedicated to defending welfare entitlements and leftist anti-poverty programs was founded in 1968. Activist Deepak Bhargava is its executive director.

*US Action: This group works closely with organized labor. It is the successor to Citizen Action, the activist group discredited by its involvement in the money-laundering scandal to re-elect Teamsters president Ron Carey in the late 1990s.

*Data Warehouse: This group was created by Clinton aide Harold Ickes and Democratic operative Laura Quinn. Ickes is critical of the Democratic National Committee under chairman Howard Dean and aims to create a sophisticated get-out-the-vote operation that rivals the Republican Party’s. Ickes proposes to build detailed voter lists that will be made available to Democratic Party candidates, and also to advocacy groups. According to a report in the Washington Post, George Soros put $11 million at Ickes’s disposal because he distrusts Howard Dean.

Does It Have A Mission?

Obviously Democracy Alliance participants have the capacity to make big grants to leftist groups, but are George Soros and his friends doing anything different that will transform America? That’s what the Alliance is promising. After the Phoenix meeting, Sarah Ingersoll, a de facto spokeswoman for the Alliance, said the group was still ironing out details. “Primarily, we’re looking at making recommendations and thinking through with these donors on how they can form an alliance. This is about creating a network of individuals to share information to be effective in whatever they do going forward.”

Ingersoll said the Alliance intended to make details of its grant making publicly available. But that promise has not been fulfilled

 

How dependent is the left on big donors? In his recent book, The Big Ripoff: How Big Business and Big Government Steal Your Money, (Wiley, 2006) Timothy Carney itemizes left-wing political contributions in 2004:

The top four donors to 527s in 2004 — and the only donors to spend in the eight figures on that election — all gave exclusively to pro-Democrat groups. Of the top 25 individual donors—all billionaires or multi-millionaires— 15 of them gave to pro-Democrat groups, and 10 gave to Republican- supporting groups. From this elite group of super-rich donors, the Democratic side got $108.4 million, compared to the Republican side’s $40 million. Soros and Lewis together spent more to defeat Bush than the ten most prolific Republican fat cats combined spent supporting the President.”

Alliance Leadership

The ostensible leaders of the Democracy Alliance are an odd lot, which may explain why the organization has had a hard time making much of a dent in politics.

Rob McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, is the new chairman of the DA. He was elected at the group’s July 2006 meeting in Boulder, Colorado. Heir to the Taco Bell fortune, the 42 year-old McKay is also a director of Vanguard Public Foundation, co-chairman of Mother Jones magazine, a board member of the Ms. Foundation for Women, and a blogger on the Huffington Post website. He was born in conservative Orange County, California and his parents were Republicans. However, like many on the left he had an awakening. McKay succeeds Steven M. Gluckstern, a founding managing director of Azimuth Alternative Assets, an investment banking firm.

The vice chairman is Anna Burger, sometimes known as the “Queen of Labor.” Burger is secretary-treasurer of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the militant union that walked out of the AFL-CIO last year and started the 6-million member Change to Win Federation, an alternative labor coalition. After she was elected chairman of Change to Win in 2005, Gannett News Service hailed Burger as arguably “the most influential woman in the U.S. labor movement.”

The first managing director of the Democracy Alliance was Rob Stein, once chief of staff to the late Ron Brown, Bill Clinton’s first commerce secretary. Stein dazzled the billionaires with his PowerPoint presentation but he turned out to be a poor manager. Early in 2006, the board offered the $400,000-a-year job to Robert Dunn, a former president of Business for Social Responsibility, a group promoting the concept of corporate social responsibility. When he declined it, the board turned to Judy Wade, a management consultant at McKinsey& Company…

The designated spokesman for the DA is supposedly Mike McCurry, the former White House press secretary for Bill Clinton. But little has been heard from McCurry about the Alliance. Lately his public relations talents have been devoted to attacking “net neutrality” legislation regulating the Internet. That has led some left-wing activists to accuse him of helping the big telecommunications companies. McCurry “represents a sickening breed of operative” and is the agent of a “hostile takeover” of the Democratic Party, charges activist David Sirota, a former press aide to socialist congressman Bernie Sanders and recently a consultant to the Ned Lamont Senate campaign in Connecticut. That sort of vitriol suggests the problems billionaires face when they pass themselves off as leaders of the left

Democracy Alliance leaders are tight-lipped about future plans. At press time, Soros had not been quoted in the media with any reaction to the Democrats’ electoral triumph. Nor had Peter B. Lewis, the 72-year-old insurance magnate, who suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized just before the November election…

The Democracy Alliance may have as many as 100 donor-members, both individuals and organizations. However, it has not made available an official list of its “partners.” Here are known members:

George Soros, the billionaire head of Soros Fund Management LLC, Soros is founder of Quantum Asset Management and the grant-making Open Society Institute. He donated $24 million of his own money to 527 committees that made “independent expenditures” to defeat George W. Bush in 2004. His son Jonathan is also a member of the DA.

Peter B. Lewis  is a billionaire insurance magnate — chairman of Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., the nation’s third-largest automobile insurer. He gave $23 million to 527 groups in 2004.

Rob McKay, heir to the Taco Bell fortune, is chairman of the DA. Enamored of tedious class-warfare rhetoric, McKay wrote at the Huffington Post website last year that “the richest Americans are getting extravagantly richer and the poor are crawling far behind, choking on the exhaust of our luxury cars. It’s also obvious that Bush’s tax policies are widening the gap between the very rich and the growing poor.”

Herb and Marion Sandler are the co-founders of Golden West Financial Corp. They sold their S&L holding company to Wachovia in May for $24 billion in cash and stock. In 2004 they gave $13 million to anti-Bush 527s.

Guy Saperstein, an Oakland, California trial lawyer, made Bill Clinton angry when he asked about Hillary’s support for the Iraq war at a May 2006 DA meeting in Austin, Texas, Arianna Huffington reported on her blog.

Rob Reiner, a Hollywood actor-director, is chairman of Parents Action for Children, a 501(c)(3) advocacy group. In 2005 he promoted Proposition 82, an unsuccessful California ballot initiative that would have raised state taxes to fund preschool for all four year-olds.

Herb Miller is a prominent Washington, D.C. real estate developer and Democratic Party fundraiser who just lost a bitter battle with the Lerner family, owners of D.C.’s new baseball franchise. Miller expected the city to authorize him to develop housing and retail near the taxpayer-subsidized stadium. The Lerners, however, demand that the city build parking structures fast and cheap before the 2008 baseball season begins. Any development “comes later,” they say.

David A. Friedman, a philanthropist and self-described centrist, is treasurer of the Friedman Family Foundation of San Mateo, California.

Ann S. Bowers is the widow of Intel cofounder Robert Noyce, inventor of the integrated circuit and “mayor of Silicon Valley.” Bowers is board chairman of Noyce Foundation.

Albert C. Yates is former president of Colorado State University.

Davidi Gio is a Cupertino, California high-tech entrepreneur and founder of Vyyo Inc. who made the Mother Jones 400 list of big leftist donors. His wife, Shamaya, created the Winds of Change Foundation in 1998, and is a heavy donor to Democratic candidates.

Mark Buell, is a San Francisco businessman. His wife, Susie Tompkins Buell, co-founded the clothier Esprit with her ex-husband, Douglas Tompkins, who is president of the Foundation for Deep Ecology.

Tim Gill (shown above) is the software entrepreneur who founded Quark, the design and layout publishing program. Gill is also president of the Gill Foundation in Denver, a funder of gay rights organizations.

Fred Baron, founder of the Dallas law firm Baron& Budd, is one of America’ s wealthiest plaintiffs’ attorneys and has won settlements in major asbestos and toxic chemicals class-action suits. He was finance chairman for Senator John Edwards’s 2004 presidential campaign.

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is an institutional member of the DA.

Alan Patric of is co-founder of private equity firm Apax Partners in New York. From 1993 to 1995, he was chairman of the White House Conference on Small Business.

Bren Simon is president of MBS Associates LLC, a property management and development firm. Her husband, Melvin, ranks 278 on the 2006 Forbes list of the world’s richest people. He is a part owner of the Indiana Pacers and runs the Simon Property Group, developer of shopping malls. (It is not known if Mr. Simon is active in the DA.)

Chris Gabrieli is a software entrepreneur and unsuccessful 2006 candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor of Massachusetts. He is also co-founder and chairman of Massachusetts 2020 Foundation, which describes itself on its website as “a non-profit foundation aimed at expanding educational and economic opportunities for children and families across Massachusetts.” Anne Bartley, the daughter of Winthrop Rockefeller, is vice chairman of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors and a trustee of the Jennifer Altman Foundation in San Francisco.

Simon Rosenberg is the founder and president of the New Democrat Network. He wrote the foreword to Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics, a book by leftist bloggers Markos Moulitsas Zuniga (Daily Kos) and Jerome Armstrong (MyDD.com). Rosenberg ran unsuccessfully in 2005 for the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee.

Bernard L. Schwartz is former CEO of Loral Space & Communications. In the 1990s he was often ranked as largest individual donor to the DNC. His wife Irene is the president of the Bernard and Irene Schwartz Foundation, a large donor to the Clinton Library Foundation.

Lewis B. Cullman is a New York financier and philanthropist. His web site says he has given away $223 million to date.

Rob Glaser is CEO of the online multimedia company Real Networks.

Rob Johnson is a former portfolio manager for George Soros’s Quantum Fund. According to Johnson: “It’s almost as if the market is a religious icon. I see that mirrored in the very, very high valuation of the United States stock market and the tremendous conviction that citizens have throughout the country that the United States is good, is right. The free market is great, and the stock market is where you put your money.”

Michael Kieschnick is founder of Working Assets. Every time a customer uses one of the Working Assets donation-linked services (long distance, wireless and credit card), the company donates a portion of the charges to “nonprofit groups working to build a world that is more just, humane, and environmentally sustainable,” according to the company’s website, which claims that over $50 million has been raised for progressive causes.

Gara LaMarche is vice president and director of U.S. Programs for George Soros’ s Open Society Institute.

Norman Lear is the Hollywood television producer who created “All in the Family” and “Sanford and Son.”

Drummond Pike is an antiwar activist who founded the Tides Foundation.

– James Dellinger and Matthew Vadum

James Dellinger is Executive Director of Green Watch and Education Watch at Capital Research Center. Matthew Vadum is Editor of Foundation Watch.

Editor’s Note: This article has drawn heavily upon “Big $$ for Progressive Politics,” by Ari Berman (The Nation, October 16, 2006), and “A New Alliance Of Democrats Spreads Funding,” by Jim VandeHei and Chris Cillizza (Washington Post, July 17, 2006).

So now we know a little bit more about the money behind Media Matters and much else going on in the Democrat operations.

1 Comment »

More About The Donors Behind Media Matters

October 8th, 2007

This is an excerpt from a July 2007 article in the Capital Research Center publication Foundation Watch (pdf file):

David Brock

Media Matters for America: Soros-Funded Watchdog Attacks Conservatives

By Rondi Adamson

Following the Money

David Brock’s confessional writings make clear that he yearns to schmooze. Deeply wounded when the conservative A-list turned against him, he now associates with Hollywood glitterati, champagne socialists and establishment movers and shakers who are financing his online mud-wrestling at MMFA. According to the New York Times,

MMFA received “more than $2 million from wealthy liberals” as start-up money in 2004. Initial donors included cable executive Leo Hindery Jr., philanthropist James Hormel, shopping mall magnate Bren Simon, and Susie Tompkins Buell, who with her husband Douglas co-founded the Esprit clothing chain.

Buell, who met Brock at a get-together of Hillary Clinton supporters, held a fundraiser for him at her San Francisco home.

Brock has been less than open – there’s a temptation to use that word “slippery” – over MMFA’s financing. At first Media Matters spokeswoman Sally Aman insisted that “neither Media Matters nor its president and CEO David Brock has received any money from Soros or from any organization with which he is affiliated.”

But George Soros has been a major force in funding MMFA – indirectly perhaps, but powerfully, nonetheless. In early 2005, MMFA, through a spokeswoman, allowed that “the group is no longer disavowing any connection” with groups “affiliated” with Soros.

The decision to come clean, more or less, was preceded – or perhaps, expedited – by Cybercast News Service, which looked into MMFA’s financial ties. According to a CNS article (March 3, 2005), “there were numerous and extensive links between Media Matters and several Soros ‘affiliates’ like MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress and Soros ally Peter Lewis.”

And in an email to CNS regarding MMFA’s financial backers, spokeswoman Sally Aman wrote: “In response to your query regarding donor funding Media Matters for America has never received funding directly from George Soros.” Aman acknowledged support from MoveOn.org and the New Democrat Network.

She also named as a donor Soros’s friend Peter Lewis, the insurance tycoon who founded Progressive Corporation. Soros and Lewis were the top two donors to anti-Bush “527” political pressure groups during the 2004 election campaign. Each gave more than $20 million to the ostensibly independent organizations.

Regarding the dissembling and waffling around the Soros relationship, conservative activist David Horowitz said, “This is typical of Brock’ s operation. They split hairs to present an untruth…Once you have the names of donors, once you know Peter Lewis is involved, you can’t deny it [the Soros affiliation].”

Another Soros-backed think tank, the Center for American Progress (CAP), has also supported MMFA. John Podesta, CAP’s president and Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff, told the New York Sun that in 2004 CAP aided Brock by offering office space and administrative assistance.

According to its tax records, MMFA took in $155,100 in grants in 2003 and $3,564,471 in grants in 2004. Its tax return dated December 31,2005, lists income of $8,489,663 and assets of $6,344,165.

Major funders of MMFA include the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy, whose president is PBS pundit Bill Moyers ($500,000 in2005), the Gruber Family Foundation ($200,000 in 2004-5), the Barbra Streisand Foundation $25,000 ($35,000 in 2004-5), the Arca Foundation ($100,000 in 2004), and the Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation ($50,000 in 2005).

The Bohemian Foundation gave $475,000 in2004-5. Its president is Colorado heir Patricia Stryker, the 278th richest American (on the 2006 Forbes 400 list). The Glaser Progress Foundation, whose president is Real Networks media software creator Rob Glaser, gave $100,000 in 2005.

At least two funders –the Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation ($100,000 in 2003) and the Susie Tompkins Buell Foundation ($200,000 in 2004)— gave money to MMFA through the Tides Foundation, which serves as a financial intermediary for left-wing nonprofits and foundations.

The press also reports that the Democracy Alliance, the Soros-inspired consortium of extremely wealthy liberal donors, has committed to give $50 million to selected left-wing think tanks and advocacy organizations. MMFA and John Podesta’s Center for American Progress were among the first beneficiaries

Some more names for the hopper, including that great champion of “free speech,” Bill Moyers. But there are also the by now familiar names, such as the Buells.

From a footnote on page 401 of the Gerth and Van Nata book on Hillary Clinton, Her Way:

43. Newsday, September 7, 2006, A28, and New York Times, May 3, 2004, A21. Brock, in an e-mail to an author in 2007, said Hillary “was one of a large number of progressive leaders who were interested in the issue of build­ing progressive infrastructure.” One of Hillary’s closest friends, Susie Tompkins Buell, held a fund-raiser for Brock’s cause, and almost half of the Susie Tompkins Buell Foundation’s grants in 2004 and 2005 went to Media Matters. (Clinton, Living History, 334, for discussion of their friendship. Form 990 Annual Reports of the Susie Tompkins Buell Foun­dation for 2004 and 2005 show grants of $300,000 out of total grants of $636,000. See Byron York, “David Brock Is Buzzing Again,” National Review, June 14, 2004, for discussion of the fund-raiser.)

As the authors note, Susie Buell is often described as Hillary Clinton’s closest friend.


Hillary Clinton with Susie and Mark Buell.

Indeed, the two are so close that Clinton threw an engagement party for the Buells at the White House.

Some further (and not any too flattering) elucidation of the colorful Susie Thompkins Buell can be found here.

Hillary's poisoned poster child (quadruple OOOPS)


744 posted on 10/9/2007, 12:03:32 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Clinton Legacy

Clinton Legacy
http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

Hillary Offers Little Change to Bush's Policies

 
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 

It's Revival Time for the Democrats [Rats Get Religion--Pruden column]--Overnight, they morph from trying to criminalize God to constantly invoking Scripture and explaining how they’ve always been a God fan in every aspect of life.


745 posted on 10/9/2007, 7:23:26 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Who made these statements? (Hillary did)

 
Hillary, Soros, Alinsky, and Rush
 
Good piece at American Thinker about the genesis of this type of propaganda. Here is a primer on Alinsky’s Rules. The political formula is Hegel + Marx + Gramsci + Alinsky = Clinton.
 

Hillary Spoke At Wellesley Due To Pal’s Threats

October 9th, 2007

From the hallowed archives of (the then women-only) Wellesley College:

1969 Student Commencement Speech

Hillary D. Rodham
May 31, 1969

Ruth M. Adams, ninth president of Wellesley College, introduced Hillary D. Rodham, ‘69, at the 91st commencement exercises, as follows:

In addition to inviting Senator Brooke to speak to them this morning, the Class of ‘69 has expressed a desire to speak to them and for them at this morning’s commencement. There was no debate so far as I could ascertain as to who their spokesman was to be — Miss Hillary Rodham. Member of this graduating class, she is a major in political science and a candidate for the degree with honors.

In four years she has combined academic ability with active service to the College, her junior year having served as a Vil Junior, and then as a member of Senate and during the past year as President of College Government and presiding officer of College Senate. She is also cheerful, good humored, good company, and a good friend to all of us and it is a great pleasure to present to this audience Miss Hillary Rodham.

Remarks of Hillary D. Rodham, President of the Wellesley College Government Association and member of the Class of 1969, on the occasion of Wellesley’s 91st Commencement, May 31, 1969:

I am very glad that Miss Adams made it clear that what I am speaking for today is all of us — the 400 of us — and I find myself in a familiar position, that of reacting, something that our generation has been doing for quite a while now. We’re not in the positions yet of leadership and power, but we do have that indispensable task of criticizing and constructive protest and I find myself reacting just briefly to some of the things that Senator Brooke said.

This has to be brief because I do have a little speech to give. Part of the problem with empathy with professed goals is that empathy doesn’t do us anything. We’ve had lots of empathy; we’ve had lots of sympathy, but we feel that for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible.

What does it mean to hear that 13.3% of the people in this country are below the poverty line? That’s a percentage. We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction. How can we talk about percentages and trends? The complexities are not lost in our analyses, but perhaps they’re just put into what we consider a more human and eventually a more progressive perspective. The question about possible and impossible was one that we brought with us to Wellesley four years ago. We arrived not yet knowing what was not possible. Consequently, we expected a lot.

Our attitudes are easily understood having grown up, having come to consciousness in the first five years of this decade — years dominated by men with dreams, men in the civil rights movement, the Peace Corps, the space program — so we arrived at Wellesley and we found, as all of us have found, that there was a gap between expectation and realities. But it wasn’t a discouraging gap and it didn’t turn us into cynical, bitter old women at the age of 18. It just inspired us to do something about that gap. What we did is often difficult for some people to understand.

They ask us quite often: “Why, if you’re dissatisfied, do you stay in a place?” Well, if you didn’t care a lot about it you wouldn’t stay. It’s almost as though my mother used to say, “I’ll always love you but there are times when I certainly won’t like you.” Our love for this place, this particular place, Wellesley College, coupled with our freedom from the burden of an inauthentic reality allowed us to question basic assumptions underlying our education.

Before the days of the media orchestrated demonstrations, we had our own gathering over in Founder’s parking lot. We protested against the rigid academic distribution requirement. We worked for a pass-fail system. We worked for a say in some of the process of academic decision making. And luckily we were in a place where, when we questioned the meaning of a liberal arts education there were people with enough imagination to respond to that questioning. So we have made progress.

We have achieved some of the things that initially saw as lacking in that gap between expectation and reality. Our concerns were not, of course, solely academic as all of us know. We worried about inside Wellesley questions of admissions, the kind of people that should be coming to Wellesley, the process for getting them here. We questioned about what responsibility we should have both for our lives as individuals and for our lives as members of a collective group.

Coupled with our concerns for the Wellesley inside here in the community were our concerns for what happened beyond Hathaway House. We wanted to know what relationship Wellesley was going to have to the outer world. We were lucky in that one of the first things Miss Adams did was to set up a cross-registration with MIT because everyone knows that education just can’t have any parochial bounds any more.

One of the other things that we did was the Upward Bound program. There are so many other things that we could talk about; so many attempts, at least the way we saw it, to pull ourselves into the world outside. And I think we’ve succeeded. There will be an Upward Bound program, just for one example, on the campus this summer.

Many of the issues that I’ve mentioned — those of sharing power and responsibility, those of assuming power and responsibility have been general concerns on campuses throughout the world. But underlying those concerns there is a theme, a theme which is so trite and so old because the words are so familiar. It talks about integrity and trust and respect.

Words have a funny way of trapping our minds on the way to our tongues but there are necessary means even in this multi-media age for attempting to come to grasps with some of the inarticulate maybe even inarticulable things that we’re feeling. We are, all of us, exploring a world that none of us even understands and attempting to create within that uncertainty. But there are some things we feel, feelings that our prevailing, acquisitive, and competitive corporate life, including tragically the universities, is not the way of life for us. We’re searching for more immediate, ecstatic and penetrating mode of living.

And so our questions, our questions about our institutions, about our colleges, about our churches, about our government continue. The questions about those institutions are familiar to all of us. We have seen heralded across the newspapers. Senator Brooke has suggested some of them this morning. But along with using these words — integrity, trust, and respect — in regard to institutions and leaders we’re perhaps harshest with them in regard to ourselves.

Every protest, every dissent, whether it’s an individual academic paper, Founder’s parking lot demonstration, is unabashedly an attempt to forge an identity in this particular age. That attempt at forging for many of us over the past four years has meant coming to terms with our humanness.

Within the context of a society that we perceive — now we can talk about reality, and I would like to talk about reality sometime, authentic reality, inauthentic reality, and what we have to accept of what we see — but our perception of it is that it hovers often between the possibility of disaster and the potentiality for imaginatively responding to men’s needs.

There’s a very strange conservative strain that goes through a lot of New Left, collegiate protests that I find very intriguing because it harkens back to a lot of the old virtues, to the fulfillment of original ideas. And it’s also a very unique American experience. It’s such a great adventure. If the experiment in human living doesn’t work in this country, in this age, it’s not going to work anywhere.

But we also know that to be educated, the goal of it must be human liberation. A liberation enabling each of us to fulfill our capacity so as to be free to create within and around ourselves. To be educated to freedom must be evidenced in action, and here again is where we ask ourselves, as we have asked our parents and our teachers, questions about integrity, trust, and respect. Those three words mean different things to all of us.

Some of the things they can mean, for instance: Integrity, the courage to be whole, to try to mold an entire person in this particular context, living in relation to one another in the full poetry of existence. If the only tool we have ultimately to use is our lives, so we use it in the way we can by choosing a way to live that will demonstrate the way we feel and the way we know. Integrity — a man like Paul Santmire.

Trust. This is one word that when I asked the class at our rehearsal what it was they wanted me to say for them, everyone came up to me and said “Talk about trust, talk about the lack of trust both for us and the way we feel about others. Talk about the trust bust.” What can you say about it? What can you say about a feeling that permeates a generation and that perhaps is not even understood by those who are distrusted? All they can do is keep trying again and again and again. There’s that wonderful line in East Coker by Eliot about there’s only the trying, again and again and again; to win again what we’ve lost before.

And then respect. There’s that mutuality of respect between people where you don’t see people as percentage points. Where you don’t manipulate people. Where you’re not interested in social engineering for people. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences.

And the word “consequences” of course catapults us into the future. One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn’t want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn’t want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she’s afraid. Fear is always with us but we just don’t have time for it. Not now.

There are two people that I would like to thank before concluding. That’s Ellie Acheson, who is the spearhead for this, and also Nancy Scheibner who wrote this poem which is the last thing that I would like to read:

My entrance into the world of so-called “social problems”
Must be with quiet laughter, or not at all.
The hollow men of anger and bitterness
The bountiful ladies of righteous degradation
All must be left to a bygone age.
And the purpose of history is to provide a receptacle
For all those myths and oddments
Which oddly we have acquired
And from which we would become unburdened
To create a newer world
To transform the future into the present.
We have no need of false revolutions
In a world where categories tend to tyrannize our minds
And hang our wills up on narrow pegs.
It is well at every given moment to seek the limits in our lives.
And once those limits are understood
To understand that limitations no longer exist.
Earth could be fair. And you and I must be free
Not to save the world in a glorious crusade
Not to kill ourselves with a nameless gnawing pain
But to practice with all the skill of our being
The art of making possible.

The Ellie Acheson mentioned is Eleanor “Eldie” Acheson was Hillary’s roommate for all four years at Wellesley. She is a longtime supporter and close friend of Hillary’s.

As the speech graciously notes, it was Eldie who pressured the president of Wellesley, Ruth Adams, to let Hillary be the first student in the history of the school to deliver a speech at graduation.

From “Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton,” by Jeff Gerth and Don van Natta, Jr., pp 34-7:

The Art of Making Possible

ALL THAT WAS LEFT was graduation from Wellesley, which Hillary assumed would be uneventful — an assessment that turned out to be far off the mark. A classmate and friend, Eleanor “Eldie” Acheson, the granddaughter of Dean Acheson, President Truman’s secretary of state, had the idea that a student should address the graduating class at commencement for the first time in the college’s history. Wellesley president Ruth Adams quickly rejected the proposal.

Acheson refused to take no for an answer, however, declaring that she would stage a counter-commencement that weekend and that she was certain her famous grandfather would attend. Hillary, as student government president, was summoned to see President Adams in her house on the shore of Lake Waban on campus.

“What is the real objection?” Hillary asked.

“It’s never been done,” Adams replied.

“Well, we could give it a try.”

“We don’t know whom they are going to ask to speak,” Adams said.

“Well,” Hillary said, “they asked me to speak.”

“I’ll think about it.”

Adams finally approved the request, probably relying on her faith in Hillary…

Her speech was greeted with a standing ovation from her classmates, but President Adams was deeply disappointed with the message, and especially with Hillary’s spontaneous decision to rebut comments by the official commencement speaker. It was, she thought, disrespectful.

Later that day, Hillary said good-bye to Wellesley by breaking its rules. She jumped into Lake Waban near her dorm, an area where swimming was strictly forbidden. She left her cut-off jeans, T-shirt, and aviator-style sunglasses on the shore. “I didn’t have a care in the world as I swam out toward the middle, and because of my nearsightedness, my surroundings looked like an Impressionist painting.”

When she returned to the shore, her clothes and glasses were missing. A campus security guard told Hillary that President Adams had seen Hillary swimming from her house and ordered them confiscated.

It may have provoked President Adams’s ire, but her speech nevertheless attracted national attention. Highlights from it, as well as her photograph [above], appeared in the June 1969 issue of Life magazine. and she gave an interview to a Chicago TV station. Hillary’s mother basked in the media attention lavished on her only saying she had heard the full gamut of reactions, from salutations like “she spoke for a generation” to criticism like “who does she think she is?”

The accolades and attacks,” Hillary later reflected, “turned out preview of things to come.

Ms. Acheson is a lawyer who was a liaison to the gay community for presidential candidate John Kerry. Before that she served in the Justice Department as the Assistant Attorney General for Policy Development under Janet Reno during the Clinton administration.

She is the founding Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Ms. Acheson also finds the time to head the Lesbian Gay Bi-Sexual Transgendered Americans For Hillary Steering Committee.

In addition to inviting Senator Brooke to speak to them this morning, the Class of ‘69 has expressed a desire to speak to them and for them at this morning’s commencement. There was no debate so far as I could ascertain as to who their spokesman was to be — Miss Hillary Rodham.

And so Ms. Rodham’s brilliant political career began, with a cringing coward papering over a threat from one of Hillary’s first (but far from last) bullying henchmen.

That’s Hillary’s “art of making possible.”

9 Comments »
 
What's Tax 'Fairness'?--The problem with the federal government lies in its transformation over the decades from an institution providing a common defense and maintaining common infrastructure into an institution that simply robs Peter to pay Paul.
 
The Truth About SCHIP Shortfalls--There is no authority granted for FedGov to be in the health biz, the education biz, the energy or transportation biz, either.

746 posted on 10/10/2007, 9:32:44 AM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: All
Taking Care of Sandy
 
TARGET: CAUGHT IN THE CROSSHAIRS OF BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON --- by Kathleen Willey
 
Video - The Clinton Chronicles -- MUST SEE
http://tinyurl.com/29y6wf
 
This Week's Hillary Giveaway: 'American (Socialist) Retirement Accounts'
 
STATEMENT OF SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON ON ESTATE TAX VOTE
 
 
 
What’s Tax ‘Fairness’? (The Bottom 50% of wage earners pay only 3% of Federal Income Taxes)

747 posted on 10/10/2007, 8:31:48 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Attn. icwhatudo: Hillary Clinton Says "Lay off Graeme Frost"

 
Hillary Exposed Promo Movie
 
 
 
 
The Sandy Man Can...

...return to public life, thanks to his sweetheart deal with the Department of Justice. He's now back with the Clinton machine as a member of Hillary's foreign policy team. Michael Ramirez comments in Investors Business Daily; click to enlarge:

Posted by John at 11:38 PM | Permalink 
 

toon100207.gif

DON ADAMS UPDATE: Teamster Beating Victims Appeal Judge's Order To Pay Union $15 Grand--The injustice just never ends.

748 posted on 10/11/2007, 9:41:32 AM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Soros: From Dots to Patterns (Long but worth reading)
 
Hillary Clinton, centrist uniter -- and Crush Rush Dem

749 posted on 10/11/2007, 2:09:59 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Video Of Hillary Caught In Lie About Illegal Fundraisers In California !
 
Hillary says, "I have a million ideas, the country can't afford them all!"
 
The company she keeps
 
Hillary Clinton - still socialist after all these years
 
"HILLARY UNCENSORED" documentary - late October debut in New Hampshire and New York?

750 posted on 10/11/2007, 8:05:06 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Baby Bond And The Bath Water
 
Hillary Clinton Fundraising Scandal: Million Mom March, 2000
 
Hillary Clinton Spend-O-Meter
 
Hillary the Impostor
 
Seven Signs of a Falling Nation

751 posted on 10/11/2007, 11:15:20 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 
 
 
Clinton: Internet Access Key to Economy--Every day she promises more 'free' stuff...
"Free" broadband? How will Hillary pay for it?
The same way her husband did in '92. He and Algore probably campaigned for the same damn thing ...along with free shoes for the children, two teachers in every classroom, free nurse visits for new mothers, new medicare benefit here, 300% increase in subsidies for ethanol, etc.

752 posted on 10/12/2007, 11:17:13 AM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
HillaryCare -- The Preview--the problem is a supply problem--too few doctors, nurses, and other medical technicians. You can't fix a supply problem with a demand-side solution, which is what they are trying to do.
753 posted on 10/12/2007, 1:56:14 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Media Ignores Hillary’s Scandals

Hillary Documentary trailer HILLARY UNCENSORED is No. 1 ranking google video for last three days

Hillary and The Mother of All Cover Ups

Universal Care's Filthy Failure
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
S-CHIP de-Frosted (FR Mentioned)

754 posted on 10/13/2007, 6:56:51 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hill brings The Fear — and loathing
 
Democrats: Children Will Get Insurance--Oh, please, Keep your hands out of my pockets and stay away from my children.
 
WHY DO YOU HATE CHILDREN SO MUCH?!

755 posted on 10/14/2007, 8:22:28 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
BLOGGERGATE: Hillary Leads Army of Paid Bloggers
 
See Hillary on tape at Spago luncheon discussing the surfer blind date a Dartmouth Winter Carnival
 
Stunning new video of Flight 800 crash site (Missle strike theory)--Quite a while ago, there was a very plausible story on a DC radio talk station, which said that if terrorists shot down Flight 800, then the Secret Service (& FAA) could not guarantee the safety of air traffic in the US. Consequently, the President would have to travel by train. Ergo, Flight 800 was not shot down by terrorists - no matter what eye witness saw or what available films showed.. This was a case when the nation was under attack, and we were too "dumb" to realize it.
 
And, kiddies, who was Prez at this time?

756 posted on 10/15/2007, 8:55:56 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary Clinton Starts Week on Women's Issues by Promoting Abortion
 
Hillary's "Star Studded" birthday bash

757 posted on 10/15/2007, 11:13:21 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

GOP To Take On Hillary’s 1992 Eavesdropping

October 15th, 2007

Gee, this sounds strangely familiar.

From The Hill:

GOP targeting Clinton on phone-call snooping

By Alexander Bolton

October 16, 2007

Republicans plan to seize on an allegation from the 1992 presidential campaign to tarnish Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) on the red-hot issue of government surveillance.

Government surveillance will be at the forefront of the political debate this fall as congressional Democrats and President Bush square off over legislation allowing electronic spying on U.S. soil without a warrant.

Republicans are focusing on an allegation in a recent book by two Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters, which suggests Clinton listened to a secretly recorded conversation between political opponents.

In their book about Clinton’s rise to power, Her Way, Don Van Natta Jr., an investigative reporter at The New York Times, and Jeff Gerth, who spent 30 years as an investigative reporter at the paper, wrote: “Hillary’s defense activities ranged from the inspirational to the microscopic to the down and dirty. She received memos about the status of various press inquiries; she vetted senior campaign aides; and she listened to a secretly recorded audiotape of a phone conversation of Clinton critics plotting their next attack.

“The tape contained discussions of another woman who might surface with allegations about an affair with Bill,” Gerth and Van Natta wrote in reference to Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton. “Bill’s supporters monitored frequencies used by cell phones, and the tape was made during one of those monitoring sessions.”

A GOP official said, “Hillary Clinton’s campaign hypocrisy continues to know no bounds. It is rather unbelievable that Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us. Team Clinton can expect to see and hear this over and over again over the course of the next year.”

Gerth told The Hill that he learned of the incident in 2006 when he interviewed a former campaign aide present at the tape playing. He has not revealed the aide’s identity. Clinton’s campaign has not disputed any facts reported in the final version of his book, which became public this spring, he said.

“It hasn’t been challenged,” said Gerth. “There hasn’t been one fact in the book that’s been challenged.” …

Several legal experts said it was illegal to intercept cell phone conversations in 1992.

“It’s been clear that since 1986 it was illegal to intercept an individual cell phone call,” said Barry Steinhardt, the director of the technology and liberty program at the American Civil Liberties Union.

Clinton has made privacy an issue on the campaign trail. In July, she discussed her privacy bill of rights in a speech to the American Constitution Society. The proposed rights, ensconced in the Protect Act, include the right to sue when privacy rules have been violated; the right to protect phone records; and the right to freeze credit in the event of identity theft.

During the same speech, she addressed the controversy over government surveillance.

“Every president should save those powers for limited, critical situations,” said Clinton, according to a copy of the speech posted on her campaign website. “And when it comes to a regular program of searching for information that touches the privacy of ordinary Americans, those programs need to be monitored and reviewed as set out by Congress in cooperation with the judiciary.

“That is the essence of the compact we have with each other and with our government, and we cannot ignore it.” …  

The Gerth and Van Natta book came out in June 8, 2007, more than four months ago.

Would it be immodest to note that nobody said beans about this somewhat buried revelation until after it was featured right here on our little corner of the world?

Here is what we posted on October 3, 2007:

**********

Hillary Eavesdropped On Phone Calls Of Critics

From “Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton,” by Jeff Gerth and Don van Natta, Jr., pp 93-4, which describes one of Mrs. Bill Clinton’s roles in the 1992 campaign:

The Defense Team

Hillary’s defense activities ranged from the inspirational to the microscopic to the down and dirty. She received memos about the status of various press inquiries;10 she vetted senior campaign aides;11 and she listened to a secretly recorded audiotape of a phone conversation of Clinton critics plotting their next attack. The tape contained discussions of another woman who might surface with allegations about an affair with Bill. Bill’s supporters monitored frequencies used by cell phones, and the tape was made during one of those monitoring sessions.12

A lot had changed since the moment eighteen years earlier when Hillary had been aghast at the suggestion that the Clinton campaign use underhanded means to garner votes in rural Arkansas.

Yet again, Bill Clinton’s chances were being jeopardized by rumors of his womanizing. And yet again, it was up to Hillary to minimize the threat — and if that meant listening to a tape that had been obtained under questionable circumstances, then she would just deal with it.

10. Numerous 1992 campaign memoranda addressed to Hillary Rodham Clinton.
11. David Halberstam, War in a Time of Peace (New York: Scribner, 2001), 20.
12. Author interview with former campaign aide present at the tape playing in 2006.

That’s right. Mrs. Bill Clinton listened in on tapes of the private phone calls of critics. She eavesdropped on private citizens in order to try to head off the next “bimbo eruption.” All of which is surely highly illegal.

And mind you these aren’t allegations from the “vast rightwing conspiracy.” This is from the pens of the New York Times reporters and Pulitzer Prize winners Gerth and Van Nata.

Of course this is the same worthy who is now marshaling her surrogates and minions to silence Rush Limbaugh, and anyone else she perceives as standing in the way of her coronation. It is clear she will not stop at anything to achieve power.

This is “her way.”

**********

Once again S&L leads the way to a better tomorrow.

Meanwhile, just for a lark, let’s remember what Mrs. Clinton had to say upon the resignation of that arch-criminal Alberto Gonzales just last August, at the “Presidential Cancer Forum” (sic):

Hillary on Gonzales Resignation

“Yes, I think we should set a standard that the next Attorney General cares about the rule of law more than he cares about protecting the President.”

She’s beautiful when she’s self-righteous, isn’t she?

Or maybe not “beautiful.”  2 Comments »

HILLARY CLINTON: Tapping phones and planning violence against Iran?

It'll be like President Cheney, only with hair!

Hillary's 3rd Quarter Refunds: Large, But Lacking

Clinton report lists refunds to 249 Hsu donors


758 posted on 10/16/2007, 8:54:05 AM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Report Reveals New Details About Hsu Fundraising (filed by Mrs. Bill Clinton)
 
 Hillary Clinton's Agenda for Working Families: Helping Parents Balance Work & Family-- She certainly has an entitlement program for every minority in this country.
 
TONIGHT: RUDY UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'WHAT IS HER EXPERIENCE?'
 
Paul v Clinton - ACLU appellate court judges protect Hillary, HOWEVER, SHE WILL SOON BE UNDER OATH
 
Clinton Kosovo Policy Will Haunt Candidate Clinton (Good read about history of conflict)

759 posted on 10/16/2007, 11:08:18 PM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Democrats' SCHIP Runs Aground (Free Republic Mentioned)
 
(PETER PAUL RESPONDS) Hillary’s “Crime On Tape” Protected By CA Appellate Court

Are you ....Experienced?

RU-DAY!

TONIGHT: RUDY UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'WHAT IS HER EXPERIENCE?' via Drudge

Excerpt from Mayor Giuliani's interview that airs tonight on FOXNEWS's Hannity & Colmes at 9PM ET

 

R. GIULIANI: "Honestly, in most respects, I don't know Hillary's experience. She's never run a city, she's never run a state. She's never run a business. She has never met a payroll. She has never been responsible for the safety and security of millions of people, much less even hundreds of people.

"So I'm trying to figure out where the experience is here. It would seem to me that in a time of difficult problems and war we don't want on the job training for an executive. The reality is that these areas in which - maybe there are some areas in which she has experience but the areas of having the responsibility of the safety and security of millions of people on your shoulders is not something Hillary has ever had any experience with."


760 posted on 10/17/2007, 9:25:49 AM by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, plunderin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,761-1,780 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson