Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neanderthal and Human Matings Get a Date
Smithsonian 'blogs ^ | August 15, 2012 | Erin Wayman

Posted on 08/21/2012 3:03:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

Two years ago the analysis of the Neanderthal genome revealed modern humans carry Neanderthal DNA, implying our ancestors mated with Neanderthals at some point in the past. Scientists only found genetic traces of Neanderthals in non-African people, leading to the conclusion that Neanderthal-human matings must have occurred as modern humans left Africa and populated the rest of the world. A new paper (PDF) posted on arXiv.org puts a date on those matings: 47,000 to 65,000 years ago...

To determine what really happened, Sankararaman's team looked at rates of genetic change to estimate when Neanderthals and humans last exchanged genes. If the shared DNA was due to interbreeding, the team expected to find a date less than 100,000 years ago -- some time after humans left Africa. But if it was the result of sharing a common ancestor, they expected a date older than 230,000 years ago, approximately when Neanderthals and modern humans split from each other. The team's findings support the interbreeding scenario: 47,000 to 65,000 years ago.

Neanderthals aren't the only archaic species that may have contributed to the modern human gene pool. Denisovans, known from only a tooth and a finger bone, left a genetic mark in people living in Melanesia and Southeast Asia. And recent genetic evidence suggests that some ancient African populations mated with an unidentified, now-extinct hominid species that lived in Africa.

So far, our knowledge of Neanderthal and Denisovan genetics comes from only a few individuals, so our understanding of interspecies mating is likely to change as more Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA is analyzed.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.smithsonianmag.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: BenLurkin

;’)


21 posted on 08/21/2012 4:47:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

;’) Ginger Jean Lurkin?


22 posted on 08/21/2012 4:48:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


some from the FRchives, barely sorted:
23 posted on 08/21/2012 4:55:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

May be time for updating those, thanks familyop!


24 posted on 08/21/2012 4:57:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Didn’t you just post an article a few days ago stating that humans and neanderthal didn’t mate? I think you’re just trying to confuse me o.O


25 posted on 08/21/2012 5:10:04 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

that explains some of the redheads that I dated!


26 posted on 08/21/2012 5:51:55 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

That was someone else, I think Pharmboy? But I am trying to confuse you, I’m just a one-man barrel of monkeys.


27 posted on 08/21/2012 6:50:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy
Related threads:

HUMANS, NEANDERTHALS DID NOT HAVE BABIES

Darwinists Wrong Again on Human Evolution

28 posted on 08/21/2012 7:09:25 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

29 posted on 08/21/2012 7:18:54 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

http://www.themandus.org/


30 posted on 08/22/2012 1:51:09 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

That site is usually touted by someone else, suffice to say, it is, at best, not to be taken seriously (i.e., it’s a poor attempt at sci-fi) or at best, is just straight garbage.


31 posted on 08/22/2012 2:18:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It seemed to be as plausible as any of the other speculation one sees.

Could you tell me what makes it garbage?


32 posted on 08/23/2012 11:54:49 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dsc

It’s garbage because it’s entirely fictional; in particular, his cartoonlike apes are not based on Neandertal morphology. He’s pushing fiction, perhaps hoping for a book and/or movie deal. Or maybe he’s just wacked.


33 posted on 08/24/2012 4:25:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks.


34 posted on 08/25/2012 7:01:18 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson