Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'll SEE ANN COULTER'S 'BILL CLINTON RAPE CHARGE' AND RAISE HER 'ONE HILLARY CLINTON'
Hannity & Colmes | 6.08.06 | Mia T

Posted on 06/07/2006 8:38:43 PM PDT by Mia T

I'll SEE ANN COULTER'S 'BILL CLINTON RAPE CHARGE' 1 AND RAISE HER 'ONE HILLARY CLINTON' 2

by Mia T, 6.07.06

 



New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a "vicious, mean-spirited attack" on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows.... Perhaps her book should have been called 'Heartless.'" the senator said....

The New York Democrat and former first lady said she found it "unimaginable that anyone in the public eye could launch a vicious, mean-spirited attack....

The senator spoke after delivering a speech on protecting children from exposure to sex- and violence-saturated media.

Hillary lashes out at Ann Coulter
By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer
Wed Jun 7, 2:09 PM ET





'Before criticizing others for being 'mean' to women, perhaps hillary should talk to her husband who was accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick and was groping Kathleen Willey at the very moment Willey's husband was committing suicide.'

Ann Coulter






CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

by Mia T, 6.11.05

 

 

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson


The closest... Clinton has ever come to answering allegations... he raped an Arkansas woman in 1978 is a distance measurable only in light-years.

After Juanita Broaddrick made the accusation in 1999, [Clinton]'s attorney, David Kendall, alone answered, saying any such charges were "absolutely false."

Of course, attorney Robert Bennett believed... Clinton when he said he hadn't had sex with Monica Lewinsky and defended the president then on no toss sturdy grounds.

Thus while lawyers can spare Mr. Clinton awkward moments at the podium in which he has to say, "I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky" or "I did not fondle that woman, Kathleen Wlley" or "I did not rape that woman, Mrs. Broaddrick," their comments are, in effect, non-denial denials.

Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home.

In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

"What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?"

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE



AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK

DO YOU REMEMBER?

SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

 

As I watched Rick Lazio's interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio's views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.

I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.


Juanita Broaddrick
Arkansas


 

 

 

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME! 


 

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS




 

"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."

[Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]

MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS




 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL




Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000




The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00




 

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy




Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home.

In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

"What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?"

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE

Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000





 

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband?

 

Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

DO YOU REMEMBER?
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000




 

"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN




 

"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available
HERE)


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"

by Mia T, 5.23.06

 

 

original site
thanx to workingclassfilth for video
special thanx to Jim Robinson
"I was followed around on my book tour by people who'd hold up signs and scream at me, 'What about Juanita Broaddrick?' And all the younger people would look at me and say, 'Who's that?' That's part of the problem with dredging up all that old Clinton stuff. More and more people have no idea what you're talking about."1

Susan Estrich
The Trouble With Hillary


In the cases on which this book focuses, the man is not the armed stranger jumping from the bushes--nor yet the black man jumping the white woman, the case that was most likely to result in the death penalty prior to 1977, and the stereotype that may explain in part the seriousness with which a white male criminal justice system has addressed "stranger" rape. Instead the man is a neighbor, an acquaintance, or a date. The man and the woman are both white, or both black, or both Hispanic. He is a respected bachelor, a student, a businessman, or a professional. He may have been offered a ride home or invited in. He does not have a weapon. He acted alone. It is, in short, a simple rape.

Susan Estrich, Real Rape
the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich
by Mia T, 10.21.05




o hum. The usual suspects are reprising the old-news "old news" clinton defense, a non sequitur that they used in the '90s to great if not good effect to abet standard-issue clinton corruption, ineptitude, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, rape and treason.

Unfortunately for the clintons, all this old-news "old news" serves only to remind us that the clintons and their transparent schemes are, themselves, old news.2

QUINTESSENTIAL CLINTON ILLOGIC

When Estrich argues that missus clinton will benefit from an electorate increasingly ignorant of the clintons' sorry legacy, she has it exactly backwards.

With 100% name recognition and at most 10% corruption-failure recognition, missus clinton has only one way to go.

And it ain't up.3

Estrich's error is rooted in the assumption that for certain segments of the population, ignorance is immutable. (The perpetual welfare state, contradictorily, is the fallacious and yet self-fulfilling endpoint of such thinking.)

So why is Susan Estrich making such a transparently spurious and insulting argument? She isn't that dumb.

For the same reason Harold Ickes is fulminating on C-SPAN.

The election of 2004 confirmed missus clinton's worst fears:
9/11 and
the clintons' willful, utter failure for eight years to confront terrorism) were transformative. They caused a political realignment--for all practical purposes permanent--that is not good news for clinton, or for the Democrats, generally.

The white woman, the only real swing voter, the demographic the Democrats MUST get in order to win the White House, has turned red.

The clintons' triple rape of Juanita Broaddrick4 and their willful, self-serving utter failure to confront terrorism are the one-two punch that has the potential to knock the clintons off the public stage.... For good.... And for The Good.

ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)
by Mia T, 4.28.06


ALBRIGHT: 'Bin Laden and his Network Declared War
on the United States and Struck First and We Have Suffered Deeply'



MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

HEAR CLINTON! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
by Mia T, 4.24.06



READ MORE

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

 
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY


HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes


ESTRICH BOOK EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN


NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES


CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons


HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY


THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)


OPEN LETTER TO SEAN HANNITY ON ESTRICH INTERVIEW, THE CLINTONS' RAPE OF BROADDRICK
(with additions, corrections, addendum)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)


HILLARY'S ARMOR: A decades-old story...


My New York Times Review of Munich
(please FReep)


AFTERWORD
MUNICH: A CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND

(please see post 38)


THE 'MUNICH' ALLUSION:
THE DANGER OF SPIELBERG AND THE AMERICAN LEFT

(Please see
post 60)


Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000


WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


ON WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND WIRETAPS:
THE ABYSMAL CONSTITUTIONAL RECORD OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON


CHRIS MATTHEWS: 'BUSH BELONGS ON MOUNT RUSHMORE'
IF HE WINS 'GREATEST GAMBLE SINCE ROOSEVELT BACKED BRITAIN BEFORE WWII'


THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: The "Brinkley" Lie


AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)


WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA


I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS:
Justice Undone in the clinton White House


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.


AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
December 7, 1941+64


IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)



IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL?


clintonCORRUPTION: the more things change. . . .


Yitzhak Shamir Validated: THE CLINTONS ARE "A GREAT DANGER TO JEWS"


for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)


CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5


A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA


NEWT: CLINTON COMMITTED ONE OF WORST CRIMES, ENDANGERED COUNTRY, IF HIT ABDULLAH UP FOR CASH


Listen to this and ask yourself if America Ever Had the Remotest Chance Under a clinton to Avoid 9/11
(To paraphrase Einstein: "The unleashed power of terrorism has changed everything save our modes of thinking, and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophes.")


Is the 9/11 commission calling bill clinton's statement '"unreliable," or did it choose willful ignorance this time, too?


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


NANO-PRESIDENT, MEGA-DISASTER
history will not be kind to bill + hillary clinton


NANO-PRESIDENT
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton


HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update


TALL-TALE TWEAK:
In honor of Rosa Parks, 'burning church' becomes 'bus' for 'first black president'
(clip included)

For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads


"I support the poor but not the war on poverty."


pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA


The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power
REASON 1: SHE HIRED JAMIE GORELICK


HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall



HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?



"What, me worry?"


ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)


Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY

Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE



DEMOCRATIC FASCISM [beware hillary clinton]


THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11


Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD


SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor


REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor2


hillary's burqa


HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


Why ABC's "Commander-in-Chief" is a Condi Rice clone


THE "COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF" AIN'T HILLARY (with afterword)


HILLARY IN AVIARY


ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON


the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings


CONDI RICE-HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP-2008
(BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST2)


HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED
(kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES:

 CINDY SHEEHAN:

 

JEANINE PIRRO:



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; broaddrick; clintonism; corruption; coulter; elections; hillary; hillary06; hillary08; hillaryclinton; juanitabroaddrick; missusclinton; rape; sheknewclintonrape; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-149 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2006 8:39:11 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

thanx for the heads up ping :)


2 posted on 06/07/2006 8:40:31 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...

ping


3 posted on 06/07/2006 8:42:31 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary's continued presence in politics should be labeled "pointless."


4 posted on 06/07/2006 8:42:33 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Drudge has pulled his flash news of the Hillary vs Ann battle. Anyone know why?


5 posted on 06/07/2006 8:42:38 PM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Along with "pointless," we might add "obscene."

I wonder when she'll finally have to pay up to Satan.


6 posted on 06/07/2006 8:45:58 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bannie

I just get the impression that she's paid up in advance. She's got talent on loan from Satan.


7 posted on 06/07/2006 8:49:24 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina
Can't speak for Sludge, but as a guess I'd say it's because there is never any 'battle' between wit and witlessness, except in the minds of the witless and the Left...but I repeat myself.

Thank you, Mr. Twain.

8 posted on 06/07/2006 8:49:37 PM PDT by SAJ (x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The Swift Boat Campaign will look like a day at the beach by comparison once Slick and Slickette, the Arkansas Grifters hit the campaign trail.


9 posted on 06/07/2006 8:50:11 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

HA! I think you're right.

(...mumbles something about contempt for the evil b*tch...)


10 posted on 06/07/2006 8:51:44 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bannie; Enterprise

The gall of those two rapists to show their face in public, never mind force themselves back into the White House. A fatal miscalculation, I think....


11 posted on 06/07/2006 8:54:33 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good post.

Hillary has lost credibility with the wacko rats and this an opportunity for her to score points with them. Hillary should be cautious though, Coulter will eat her for lunch - LoL!

12 posted on 06/07/2006 8:54:59 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I pray to God that you are right, Mia. I worry because clintons cheat.


13 posted on 06/07/2006 8:57:28 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


14 posted on 06/07/2006 8:58:30 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie

You are exactly right. That's why it's critical that we cut her off in the pass.


15 posted on 06/07/2006 9:02:41 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

As I recall, Hillary aka The Witch is selective about which 9/11 families she meets with. I've heard 9/11 families being interviewed and they said that she wouldn't meet with them.


16 posted on 06/07/2006 9:03:45 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
>Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?

I'm more concerned with what the psycho did to take the Broaddrick story off the headlines.

This little girl was named Milica Rakic. At three years of age when she was killed by a NATO/KKKlintonista bomb hundreds of kilometers from anything remotely resembling any sort of legitimate military target, Milica likely has the dubious distinction of being Slick KKKlinton's youngest female victim.

I'd like to hear what Hillary KKKlinton might have to say to the families of Milica and the several thousand other little slavic orthodox kids who were killed or maimed in Dog-Wag III, i.e. Kosovo.

17 posted on 06/07/2006 9:08:58 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I recall that, too.
And the meetings she does have are simply photo-ops. She is despicable.


18 posted on 06/07/2006 9:09:17 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"The gall of those two rapists to show their face in public, never mind force themselves back into the White House. A fatal miscalculation, I think...."

It will take constant and diligent effort to keep the story of this couple up front. The have a long history separate and with each other. All of which borders on and are criminal doings.

If one poster here on FreeRepublic had been quielty of just one of their illegal deeds they would have been behind bars.

RAISE YA ONE BUMP


19 posted on 06/07/2006 9:10:01 PM PDT by malia (FLIGHT 93 DID MORE TO FIGHT TERRORISM THAN THE WHOLE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BUMP!!!!


20 posted on 06/07/2006 9:12:47 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (FR's token San Francisco Giants fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

GREAT article & resources! Scary too!


21 posted on 06/07/2006 9:13:33 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

ping for later


22 posted on 06/07/2006 9:19:24 PM PDT by stylecouncilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia

Of all the plausible dem candidates, Hillary is the only one with the organization and infrastructure to kill people who get in her way. That makes up for a lot of deficiencies and, if you have to bet it, put your money on Hill as the dem candidate in 08.


23 posted on 06/07/2006 9:20:23 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
bump

They are both ruthless, corrupt and self-serving.

THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

And oh, that brings me to what is really the overriding issue: The intersection of clinton corruption and massive, incurable clinton conflict of interest.

There are millions of dollars from foreign entities--maybe even billions--sluicing nonstop into the clinton-family coffers. There is NO WAY the clintons can ever cure this massive conflict of interest. None. Not even impoverishment would do it.

We know that whenever the clintons had to choose between national interest and self-interest, they invariably chose self-interest. We cannot, therefore--we must not--allow these two to retake the White House. Ever.

Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, Shame on me.

QUID PRO COAL2:
CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS

(HILLARY DOES COAL AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB)

by Mia T, 4.27.06


HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON

by Mia T, 5.30.06
 
 

For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers.

William J. Broad
Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes
The New York Times
May 30, 1999





Nuclear is now very much in the news as a potential power source because of its lack of contribution to global warming. If you look at nuclear energy, which currently provides 20 percent of our energy with virtually no emission of greenhouse gases, we do have to take a serious look, but there remain very serious questions about nuclear power... in a world with suicidal terrorists.

So I have real concerns, specifically about a plant in my state near where I live, Indian Point....

So we need to resolve... questions of... proliferation... before we go forward with nuclear power.

hillary clinton
Remarks at The National Press Club
May 23, 2006




illful nuclear proliferation, the product of clinton naiveté, corruption and obsession with legacy,1 was the predominant clinton policy for eight long years.2

Missus clinton's sudden concern about proliferation, therefore, is a decade too late and a dollar too cheap. 3

The clintons turned the dilemma of the nuclear age--how to exploit nuclear energy's peaceful and productive potential while preventing the spread of nuclear weapons-- on its head: They exploited nuclear proliferation for their own gain even as they prevented the realization of nuclear energy's peaceful and productive potential.

Moreover, by ignoring terrorism for those eight years,4 the clintons caused the nuclear dilemma to become even more acute, complex and deadly with the concomitant rapid rise in non-state actors' involvement in the proliferation of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Contrary to the clintons' quaint theories,5 rogue states routinely violated their Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons nonproliferation obligations, setting up a perfect symbiosis for non-state actors--particularly terrorists--seeking to acquire and use nuclear or other WMD. The non-state actor is the rogue state's perfect WMD delivery-system: there is no return address.

"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON

The clintons, almost singlehandedly, therefore, made proliferation of WMD today's preeminent threat to international peace and security.

Some call the clintons quislings, Manchurian Candidates, bought off in Little Rock by Riady and company6 decades ago (and much too cheaply, according to their Chinese benefactors7), trading our national security for their political power. This argument is persuasive but incomplete....

READ MORE


24 posted on 06/07/2006 9:28:33 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yoe

ping


25 posted on 06/07/2006 9:31:14 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

ping


26 posted on 06/07/2006 9:31:44 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I was just reminded on another thread - a comment from Carville calling one of X's victims, trailer park trash. Next to "Can we kill them now" - it may be considered, by some, as 'no biggie'. How did we survive ALL those vile years?

Great work, as always, Mia. And the pub date for your book is....? :)


27 posted on 06/07/2006 9:40:13 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

True.

We must make sure we stay away from the Monicas. We must concentrate on the terrorism failure and the rapes.

The white woman is the only true swing voter, the voter clinton MUST get to win. But 9/11 turned the white woman red.

If we concentate on the clintons' WILLFUL terrorism failure and the clinton rapes and predations, the white woman will never vote for THAT woman.


28 posted on 06/07/2006 9:43:01 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thumbellina
Drudge has pulled his flash news of the Hillary vs Ann battle. Anyone know why?

Probably getting ready for his next flash:

"Harry Reid/Barney Frank Love Child Sues, Seeks New Mommy and Daddy"

29 posted on 06/07/2006 9:57:59 PM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

thanx :)

hillary--very much the cowardly opportunist--thought she could get a free shot here. (Most people wouldn't see Coulter's underlying argument and would therefore be sympathetic to the widows.)

But hillary is actually quite dumb. She can't see two steps ahead. She stepped right in it.


30 posted on 06/07/2006 10:01:19 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I see Ann hasn't learned nuance yet. <);=)>


31 posted on 06/07/2006 10:05:26 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

;)

thanks :)


32 posted on 06/07/2006 10:12:07 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

;)


33 posted on 06/07/2006 10:18:51 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; yoe; YaYa123; WorkingClassFilth

fyi


34 posted on 06/07/2006 10:31:57 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Remember the scene in 'A Beautiful Mind' when they walk into his room and it is covered with hundreds of newspaper articles with lines connecting them all? That is what Mia T's room must look like.


35 posted on 06/08/2006 12:30:04 AM PDT by opinionator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT


36 posted on 06/08/2006 3:02:59 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary is going to talk herself right into her real past.


37 posted on 06/08/2006 3:08:58 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

HOORAY Ann and Mia T.

Outstanding Americans asking questions.

Truth, freedom, life.

Thank you both very much.


38 posted on 06/08/2006 4:26:02 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


39 posted on 06/08/2006 4:51:44 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: malia

thanx malia :)


40 posted on 06/08/2006 4:57:00 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
We know that whenever the clintons had to choose between national interest and self-interest, they invariably chose self-interest.

They are bigger and more important than the United States.

41 posted on 06/08/2006 5:11:05 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: opinionator

Remember the scene in 'A Beautiful Mind' when they walk into his room and it is covered with hundreds of newspaper articles with lines connecting them all? That is what Mia T's room must look like.--opinionator

;)


With the reported death today of al-Zarqawi, with the seeming decline and fall of missus clinton, it is an opportune moment to revisit that mathematical model.

The problem with the model is that it doesn't address the impact of rank, the difference between leaders and foot soldiers, on a network.

The critical question that needs to be answered is this: How many terrorists or clintonistas need to be neutralized before a graph becomes disconnected and a terrorist or clintonoid cell can be labeled inert?

Some mathematicians are using lattice theory, the abstract study of order and hierarchy, to answer this question.


42 posted on 06/08/2006 5:27:22 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

In their own mind, anyway.


43 posted on 06/08/2006 5:28:27 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

thanx :)


44 posted on 06/08/2006 5:39:08 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

thank you, PGalt. :)


45 posted on 06/08/2006 5:40:14 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

bump

thx :)


46 posted on 06/08/2006 5:43:09 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...

ADDENDUM:

 
WHY HILLARY, WHY NOW?
 




illary
clinton--very much the cowardly opportunist--thought she could get a free shot here.

She figured that most people would be sympathetic to the widows because they would fail to see Coulter's underlying argument, which is this:

The Left uses victims--exploits them--and the victims themselves often exploit their own victimhood-- to promote the Left's unsaleable policies.

This tactic is premised on the Leftist's pet pc theory: the victim is unassailable, a self-fulfilling empirical truism, witness the Cindy Sheehans and the Jersey Girls.

In the end, however, this dustup is yet another example of hillary clinton's sheer incompetence. That woman can't see two steps ahead of herself.

Missus clinton stepped right in it.

DEBUNKING CINDY SHEEHAN
HEAR ABE LINCOLN/JOHNNY CASH + PBS' NEIL CONAN
by Mia T, 8.31.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


 
 

 

"You tell me the truth. You tell me that my son died for oil. You tell me that my son died to make your friends rich. You tell me my son died to spread the cancer of Pax Americana, imperialism in the Middle East."--Cindy Sheehan

"And if you think I won't say bulls**t to the President, I say move on, cause I'll say what's on my mind."
--Cindy Sheehan
 
 
 
The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.

Mia T, 5.15.04
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA





"We didn't understand why the United States was there. We never thought that Iraq was an imminent threat to the United States."--Cindy Sheehan




"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option."

President Bush






"He was murdered by Bush."--Cindy Sheehan

"You get that evil maniac out here, 'cause a Gold Star Mother, somebody whose blood is on his hands, has some questions for him."
--Cindy Sheehan

"The biggest terrorist is George W. Bush."--Cindy Sheehan




"This seems to be the President's reasons for continuing the war. Because he's killed so many American soldiers already, he has to kill more and I believe that's the most insane and immoral reason for continuing the war"--Cindy Sheehan
 
 
Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham Lincoln
"Gettysburg Address"
November 19, 1863
recited by Johnny Cash

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

47 posted on 06/08/2006 6:39:12 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
also see:
CINDY SHEEHAN: ECHO OF THE LEFT (hear them all here)

48 posted on 06/08/2006 6:48:31 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump.


49 posted on 06/08/2006 6:48:42 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Morning Mia...thanks for the ping :)


50 posted on 06/08/2006 6:49:11 AM PDT by SuzanneWeeks (If John Kerry didn't exist, Karl Rove would have to invent him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson